Posted on 08/14/2016 5:28:25 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Ever since the Democratic Convention, the only poll results being reported by the liberal mainstream media show that Hillary Clinton is slowly pulling ahead of Donald Trump. Of course the same liberal mainstream media had been conducting a biased editing and reporting campaign to show Trump in a bad way and glorify Hillary.
They edited his comments about the Muslim parents of whose son was killed in action while serving in the US military. Trump stated about the mom not speaking, the liberal media intentionally edited out when Trump stated that that’s what others have written. They made it to look like those were Trump’s own words.
Now all of the controversy surrounding the way liberals have twisted Trump’s comment about people who value the Second Amendment. Hillary and even the Kennedy family have twisted it in such a way as declare Trump is inciting violence in some form. However, none of the same liberal media, nor Clinton nor the Kennedy family mention the fact that Hillary once stated that Obama could be assassinated.
The sad part is that so many people today believe everything they hear and see from the liberal mainstream media. They take the reports as gospel.
Did you know that in most of the polls, where they are reporting a Clinton lead, are conducted in such a way as to bias the outcome? Often, they only poll 100 up to 1,000 people. Not only are their sample sizes statistically small, but they often poll areas that are known to be predominately Democratic, hence, it only makes sense that Hillary is ahead.
But you probably have not heard about one poll that was recently taken where they polled 1,000 people from every state.
(Excerpt) Read more at constitution.com ...
“...often poll areas that are known to be predominately Democratic...”
I have often wondered if they selectively choose which people to include in their poll??
In other words, if one they call polls republican, they just throw that one out and not count it...
Party ID split is even 33% GOP, 33% D 34% I.
That makes it quite credible.
Of course, that’s not how the MSM sees it and they’ll ignore it as an unlikely outlier.
If that was true, Trump would be looking at a 50-state sweep.
Not gonna happen but its nice to daydream.
Later
If that was true, Trump would be looking at a 50-state sweep.
Not gonna happen but its nice to daydream.
I’d settle for 49 states ;)
Sorry to rain on your parade, but this poll is also fake.
Because it polled only 1000 voters from CA and matched that with 1000 voters from Idaho. So essentially those 2 states neutralized each other. In reality California has 55 electoral votes, and Idaho has 4 ev’s. Which means the results from CA are 16 times more significant and should be weighted 16 times in comparison to Idaho.
Breitbart seems very proud of their poll giving Satan a 5 point lead. How can so many vote for this evil its sick especially the cucks
The Margin of Error for a National Poll of 50,000 respondents would be .44%
Those are both with a 95% Confidence Level.
That fact is that more respondents does not provide more accurate polling data.
Imagine the impact on public opinion if this was being reported daily...
Manipulation by poll.
I’m good. There is no rain on my parade. I believe Trump will win and the polls are rigged.
Clinton could win California by 40 million votes while Trump could theoretically win Idaho by a 1 vote margin. California's results have no weight on Idaho.
True but the poll isn’t playing fast and loose with party ID.
That said, Trump isn’t gonna win 67% - not in this lifetime.
In his 1984 win, Ronaldus Magnus received 59%.
I am suspicious. 50,000 people polled? With certainty on the party affiliation?
How did they get the 1,000 in Rhode Island?
Sounds like a hoax.
Not correct. If Hillary wins CA, she has 55 EV’s in the bag, regardless of vote totals in CA. If Trump wind ID, he has 4 EV’s in the bag. Which means he needs to make up 51 EV’s somewhere else to counteract results from CA.
The 19% are probably in a Coma
I am not raining on a Trump win. I hope for the same result. I was only commenting about the results of poll you posted which polled same number of voters from every state regardless of electoral votes from each state.
That makes it quite credible.
Reminds me of that "unskewed polls" nonsense that so many bought into last time around.
I like the good news, but I prefer ignoring these reports to maintain a frame of mind that we are the underdog, in the fight of our lives, so as not to become complacent until we win.
Call me stupid or whatever, but I thought most people wanted this current regime out ??? Voting for Hillary keeps the Obama regime — what kind of “change” is that ???
We Really need a complete change of guard, then and only then will “change” come —— and this economy will then re-inflat like a flat tire that has been starved for air for 8 years — when the “air” comes America’s jobs and business opportunities ignite. The great American Dream of owning YOUR OWN BUSINESS returns.
Simple, he wins New York and New Jersey
29 + 14= 43
found you 43 EVs
Plus Michigan 16
59 right there
What about that stupid California you were talking about?
Let them all smoke weed and butt hump each other, I wrote that state off years ago
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.