Posted on 08/14/2016 11:45:44 AM PDT by artichokegrower
The Natomas pastor who made national headlines for praising the killing of gay people in an Orlando nightclub has been sued by a gay protester over a shoving incident in the church parking lot.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
Not very brilliant move by pastor. Should be wise as serpents and harmless as doves. This was a pile that should have been easy to not step in.
Going on a private church parking lot to confront a pastor. Now there’s a good idea. /s
I don’t agree with comments that laud the indiscriminate killing of individuals or groups, so this guy could have made a good argument about the nature of such comments.
Hunting down a guy and confronting him like this? Nope...
sELECTIVE OUTRAGE LIKE SELECTIVE ENFORCE IS A WELL USED TOOL OF THE COMMUNIST.
The “gay” goaded this guy into pushing him.
This is their common method, be as outrageous as possible while staying technically “legal” and then provoking an escalating confrontation.
That said, the preacher seems to be off his nut too. The preacher could have pointed out the “gay” fear of violence and the hypocrisy compared with the violence of buggery. If they were sincere, they’d hate all violence.
Well I hate to say it, but he did kind of ask for it. And his unbalanced attitude made him easy to goad.
Al Sharpton asks for it. Do I walk up and confront him and shove him?
People who make comments like that pastor did, destroy themselves for you. Let them.
So, the little queer was trespassing on church property when the incident occurred?
I was talking about the preacher. The preacher was in a position to know more, therefore he has more responsibility before God.
And to me the reply to gay accusations of violence-mongering would seem ridiculously simple. Is, or is not, buggery violent?
In a place where normally the general public is expected to be welcome.
Hypocrisy is thick around this thing.
Why aren’t they going after the Imam who gave speeches to his followers encouraging them to kill homosexuals?
Imams like this may not be as shy to do things like this in the USA if they had reason to believe that the “prevailing” Christian attitude was to cross their fingers behind their backs while saying “Love thy neighbor, do not kill.”
Let Christendom in the USA get its attitude right with God before we think too much about what a minority religion in the USA is wanting to do.
Buggery is violence. What this nutty preacher proposed was violence. God hates both.
So was I.
The preacher was in a position to know more, therefore he has more responsibility before God.
I agree.
IMO < his duty was to address what he viewed to be evil. It wouldn't be to laud killing people.
And to me the reply to gay accusations of violence-mongering would seem ridiculously simple. Is, or is not, buggery violent?
That really is mute > IMO, if it is consensual.
Wrong? Most certainly. Address it. Don't laud the breaking of a Ten Commandment tenet just because you recognize something else that is evil.
Funny. He is NOT suing the men and women of the mosques who enabled the REAL SHOOTER.
A hate preacher no less.
Like Steven Anderson?
What are his damages besides being outraged?
They're connected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.