To: sukhoi-30mki; Jeff Head
Jeff Head tried to alert us to China's ship building frenzy 10 or so years ago ...
And we haggle about what bathroom to use.
We could use some Godly fire and brimstone right about now.
2 posted on
08/11/2016 6:56:12 AM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof, but they're true ... and it pisses people off)
To: sukhoi-30mki
I’m wondering how the combat power of the Red Fleet compares against that of Japan?
3 posted on
08/11/2016 6:56:15 AM PDT by
MSF BU
(Support the troops: Join Them.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Kinda reminds me of the rise of the Luftwaffe in the 1930’s.
4 posted on
08/11/2016 7:00:48 AM PDT by
Mr. Douglas
(Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Despite what some people claim, the Chinese are likely putting nuclear warheads on the anti-carrier missiles--including those from this new destroyer and the modified DF-21 missile designed specifically for attacking carriers. That's why during the Cold War, the Russians fitted a powerful 350 KT nuclear warhead to their P-5 Pyatyorka (NATO designation SS-N-3 Shaddock) long-range anti-shipping missiles to guarantee a "kill" against US carriers even if the "miss" was as much as half a mile.
5 posted on
08/11/2016 7:01:02 AM PDT by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
To: sukhoi-30mki
This is crazy! Where the heck did China get the money to do this?
;-)
6 posted on
08/11/2016 7:01:45 AM PDT by
Mr. Douglas
(Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Is there a bilge pump in every compartment?
7 posted on
08/11/2016 7:02:24 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Chinas Fleet of Carrier Killer Destroyers Is Growing>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You mean rich cannon fodder for US nuclear subs?
Bring it.
8 posted on
08/11/2016 7:20:56 AM PDT by
Candor7
( Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Any idea of how well the Chinese sailors are trained? Are the enlisted allowed to carry out tasks relatively unsupervised, or are they just around to carry out directions from officers?
The Russian and Soviet navy was officer-centric. This often reduces their effectiveness because even simple tasks cannot be accomplished without an officer's oversight. In the heat of battle, this can be a significant disadvantage.
11 posted on
08/11/2016 7:53:09 AM PDT by
Lou L
(Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
To: sukhoi-30mki
Just curious, but what is to prevent the US from just sending in stealth aircraft to sink these on the first day of a battle? Assuming we can find them of course.
20 posted on
08/11/2016 9:09:39 AM PDT by
pb929
To: sukhoi-30mki
“The Type 052D destroyer is often referred to as a carrier killer because it is designed to defend against aircraft carriers,”
Defending against one ain’t the same as killing one.
24 posted on
08/11/2016 10:13:42 AM PDT by
TalonDJ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson