Please Freepmail me if you want to be added, readded, or removed
Please Freepmail me if you want to be added, readded, or removed
I couldn’t get past the first sentence.
Anybody seriously believe that Paul RINO and Mitch “Mr. Magoo” McConnell would ever allow the impeachment of Hillary to even be debated? Heck they are already talking about helping Hillary push amnesty for illegals in her first 100 days to “prove to the liberal media that Republicans like Hispanics and Donald Trump was a fluke”. The first time CNN or the New York Times throws out the “sexism” charge any impeachment talk will be quickly crushed by the Republican establishment.
The same people, RINOS, who are against Trump would be the people who would have to impeach. Never going to happen. If the are afraid now, wait until the witch gets into office.
Sorry!
No. Lost me in sentence two.
The republicans WANT Hillary in there.
It’s all changing for these media people. Especially for tge republicans who have put it all on Hillary winning they are without anchor. They are lost.
Tge voters are irretrievably on to the con game and are calling it off. A week of the media claiming Trump has called for violence hasn’t deterred anyone. It just gains Trump more support
A claim like this that the republicans will impeach her, is read like, ‘vote for Hillary, we’ll impeach her’
They don’t even know what to say at this point. By October they’ll be babbling They’ll look like the mayor of shsrk city stammering to Chief Brody ‘my kids were on that beach too’
Because the first Clinton impeachment went so well
Usually love Mike Adams. But..... Who in Congress is going to have the guts to stand up to her? Other than a couple of Senators no one has stood up to obozo. Why would they defy Hitlery?
It seems everyone wants their 15 seconds of fame and what ever the equivalent of a couple column inches in the paper might be. To bad they can’t come up with well written paragraphs that add to the confusion. This article is way too long.
When he leads with BS like this
“Because the Republicans have decided to nominate a misinformed, unqualified, and unstable candidate it is now virtually guaranteed that Hillary Clinton will be our next president”,
I see no reason to lend credence to anything that follows.
I am sick of hearing that Trump is unqualified! Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution imposes only three eligibility requirements on persons serving as president – based on the officeholder’s age, time of residency in the U.S., and citizenship status. Under the Twelfth Amendment, the same three qualifications apply to the Vice President of the United States.
Only “natural-born” U.S. citizens (or those born abroad, but only to parents at least one of whom was a U.S. citizen at the time) may serve president of the United States, though from time to time that requirement is called into question, recently in the case of potential 2016 presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R - Texas), who was born in Canada to Cuban-born father and a U.S-born mother.
One must also be at least 35 years of age to be president. John F. Kennedy was the youngest person to be elected president; he was 43 years old when he was inaugurated in 1961. There is no maximum age limit set forth in the Constitution. Ronald Reagan was the oldest president; at the end of his term in 1988, he was nearly 77.
Finally, one must have lived in the United States for at least 14 years to be president, in addition to being a natural-born citizen. The Constitution is vague on this point. For example, it does not make clear whether those 14 years need to be consecutive or what the precise definition of residency is. So far, however, this requirement has never been challenged.
These are the only explicit criteria in the Constitution.
She will not be impeached for the same reason obummer has not been.
Two major reasons:
DC is totally corrupt. DOJ example #1.
VP will be Kaine, no more acceptable than Joe Biden.
The reason is simple: We have a case for impeaching Hillary Clinton beginning in January of 2017.”
Uh Mike, There is just One Big Problem, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Speaker of the House Ryan will be the ones DEFENDING HER, Not Impeaching Her.
Recent news reports say the notoriously greedy Clintons used their tax-exempt Clinton Foundation charity to setup a Romney-like money-making private equity fund in the corrupt country of Colombia.
Why Colombia?
WIKI REFERENCE---In 2000, the Clinton administration committed $1.3 billion in foreign aid to the corrupt country of Colombia...... and up to five hundred military personnel to train local forces. An additional three hundred civilian personnel were allowed to assist in the eradication of coca.
The Clinton deal was an addition to $330 million of previously approved US aid to Colombia. $818 million was earmarked for 2000, with $256 million for 2001.
The Clinton-era appropriations for his Colombia Plan made Colombia the third largest recipient of foreign aid from the United States at the time.
--SNIP--
As of 2008, the U.S. has provided nearly $1.3 billion to Colombia through Clinton Plan Colombia nonmilitary aid programs:
<><> Alternative Development (2000-2008 cost: $500 million)
<><> Internally Displaced Persons (2000-2008 cost: $247 million)
<><> Demobilization and Reintegration (2000-2008 cost: $44 million)
<><> Democracy and Human Rights (2000-2008 cost: $158 million)
<><> Promote the Rule of Law (2000-2008 cost: $238 million)
LONG READ--REST AT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_Colombia
==============================
04/16/2008----Former President Bill Clinton has earned hundreds of thousands of dollars speaking on behalf of a Colombia-based group pushing the trade pact, and representatives of that organization tell The Huffington Post that the former president shared their sentiment.
In June 2005, Clinton was paid $800,000 by the Colombia-based Gold Service International to give four speeches throughout Latin America. The organization is, ostensibly, a development group tasked with bringing investment to the country and educating world leaders about the Colombia’s business opportunities.
The group’s chief operating officer, Andres Franco, said in an interview that the group supports the congressional ratification of the free trade agreement and that, when Clinton was on his speaking tour, he expressed similar opinions. “He was supportive of the trade agreement at the time that he came, but that was several years ago.
In the present context, I don’t know what his position would be. It is not only about union trade rights. It is about what benefit or damage it can do to the US economy,” said Franco. “Events with the Clinton campaign [concerning Mark Penn] are not good at all for the trade agreement... Right now it became a campaign issues and that is sad, because it needs to go through.”
The comments were supported by a June 23, 2005 article from the news portal Terra (uncovered by Ben Smith at Politico) in which Clinton offered unambiguous support for the free trade agreement with Colombia.
They appear to be the first public indication that Clinton has, at least in the past, supported the trade deal. But evidence that the former president has been sympathetic to Colombia’s position is widely known. In 2007, Clinton met personally with and accepted an award from Colombia’s controversial president, Alvaro Uribe, during a time when the country was attempting to improve its image within the United States.
Subsequently, Clinton urged Congress to view the country in a more favorable light.
Moreover, Clinton has helped Frank Giustra, one of the biggest donors to the Clinton Global Initiative, score meetings with high-ranking Colombian officials. Giustra has several business interests in the country, and both he and Clinton have collaborated on an effort to (cough) "fight poverty in developing world by partnering up with mining companies in Colombia and elsewhere." http://nypost.com/2008/12/19/bubba-sheik-ing-the-money-tree/
==============================================
Ut oh, Obama's asking for billions to eradicate coca in Central America (cue govt fraud machine).
Couldn’t get past the first sentence.
Logically Mike should be in the “anybody but Cankles” camp, but he seems to prefer Cankles to Trump, he just wants to impeach her right away.
Strange.
So it stands to reason that the call to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, would require the same kind of courage in the face of evil and doom. So, why don't you please excuse yourself, get out of my foxhole because we have a war to fight. . . and, apparently, fighting this war IS NOT FOR YOU!!
If I accept his premise - as exemplified in his first sentence, then why bother with any of the rest? It’s all a fools folly.