Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Second Clinton Impeachment
Townhall.com ^ | August 11, 2016 | Mike Adams

Posted on 08/11/2016 6:21:43 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-160 next last
To: JimRed
re>but we lose both Houses in Congress you think the rats will give him everything anything he wants?

Hate to say it but Trump also has a phone and a pen.

81 posted on 08/11/2016 8:00:57 AM PDT by IC Ken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
If Trump wins, GOP holds the House and (probably) Senate.
If Trump loses, Dems take Senate and (possibly) House, appointing the Supreme Court for the rest of our lives.
82 posted on 08/11/2016 8:03:07 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Douglas

To Kaslin: “Ignoring your ad-hominem post, I’m finding that you are one of the more “level headed” posters in this thread.”

Mr Douglas
Since 2 August 2016


83 posted on 08/11/2016 8:09:00 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: IC Ken
Hate to say it but Trump also has a phone and a pen.

Yes, and a PRECEDENT! While we privately acknowledge that two wrongs don't make a right, we can publically state "Hey, no different than Obama". Sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander.

84 posted on 08/11/2016 8:09:51 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If your goal is to have Hillary NOT be President (and I understand that that is not the goal of many current “Republicans”), ask yourself, what is easier: getting mean old Trump elected in 2016, or mustering 67 Senate votes (which would include between 10 and 20 Democrat votes) for convicting Hillary in 2017 or later?

Anyone who cannot instantly answer that question correctly should keep his opinions to himself, forever.


85 posted on 08/11/2016 8:12:55 AM PDT by Burma Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why don’t you get off this Trump incompetency meme! He beat 17 of your “qualified” candidates and is the nominee. That should tell you something. I was a Cruz supporter and now I’m so glad that Trump defeated him.


86 posted on 08/11/2016 8:14:53 AM PDT by 2nd Amendment (Proud member of the 48% . . giver not a taker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Tripe.


87 posted on 08/11/2016 8:15:55 AM PDT by lakecumberlandvet (APPEASEMENT NEVER WORKS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Adams restates important information, but many of us were aware that the Clinton Foundation/Global Initiative were a money-laundering, crime syndicate long be even Schweizer’s book.

Adams’ attack on Trump at the outset was entirely uncalled for, but I guess among those bought/sold establishment types you don’t get heard unless you first prove you are an anti-Trumper.

Obviously, Adams is lacking in logical skills. Just because you don’t like Trump that doesn’t mean he isn’t better than Clinton. Nor does it mean one has to choose between the Congress and the Candidate. One can support both.

As in just about every election, a winning candidate enhances congressional chances and a losing presidential candidate injures chances of winning congress.

Obviously, if the winner has more electoral votes, then they’ve brought out voters in those states, and many of out senate races this year are in blue/purple states.

Adams must have missed this particular civics class lecture in high school.


88 posted on 08/11/2016 8:19:14 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Hillary is a traitor. But so is Barry, and after seven and a half years, Traitorcongress has done............................................................................................ nothing.

If Hillary is elected and Congress remains GOP-controlled, nothing will change.

89 posted on 08/11/2016 8:20:49 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Our efforts now are not to be directed toward getting Trump in office based on some pipe dream that he will somehow save the Supreme Court.”

Sorry, I normally like Mike Adams, but there’s no point in reading further if he’s gone surrender monkey.


90 posted on 08/11/2016 8:27:06 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Exactly. Removal through impeachment is the real pipe dream. It’s only feasible if at least some of the opposition party is willing to break ranks, and that never happens with the Democrats.


91 posted on 08/11/2016 8:28:22 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: No_More_Harkin

Looks like they got to Adams.

I usually thought he wrote pretty good stuff.

Wonder who is next.


92 posted on 08/11/2016 8:29:08 AM PDT by PeteyBoy (It's the wall, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Amen, thx for saying that!


93 posted on 08/11/2016 8:29:10 AM PDT by MissH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Love you, Mike. But you’re wrong about Trump. Do your homework, prof.


94 posted on 08/11/2016 8:32:27 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (We will no longer surrender this country to the false song of globalism. --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

I agree totally. Once that camel got her nose into the tent, there will be no getting rid of her en toto, unless she croaks in office. Then we’d be stuck with Kaine.


95 posted on 08/11/2016 8:35:44 AM PDT by kiltie65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Adams totally fails in his initial assessment of Trump. When the opening premise of an argument is so fatally flawed, the rest of the argument is moot.

And while Adams makes a few valid points about the entire corruption of the Clinton machine, his initial betrayal of Trump leaves him in the unenviable position of, having thrown the baby out with the bathwater, now saying there isn't even any need for a baby; that the baby-sitters can fix the problem. His argument makes no sense at all. And Adams comes across as a precocious child trying to look smart. A word of advice, Mike Adams - get over yourself!

Effectively and ultimately, Adams is endorsing Kaine. And that is insane.
96 posted on 08/11/2016 8:36:58 AM PDT by Montana_Sam (Truth lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If they didn’t prosecute Hillary for what she has already done, they will not impeach either. They haven’t even kept the current president in check for his many egregious and criminal acts. Never going to happen.

There are only two ways to stop Hillary now. Either elect Trump or start a revolution. Short of those two, Hillary will have little to no resistance doing all the nasty things she has openly said she will do.

Of course she could drop dead at any moment, with her terrible health and all.

But sure, by all means, make both chambers of Congress as conservative as possible. Just don’t count on that as the way to stop Hillary. Vote Trump.


97 posted on 08/11/2016 8:40:45 AM PDT by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Our efforts need to be focused on keeping a Republican House and Senate.

It would be nice if we had a Republican House and Senate in the first place.

No sale.

98 posted on 08/11/2016 8:42:42 AM PDT by kiryandil (Hillary Clinton is not sophisticated enough to understand the Bill of Rights, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The writer is confused. I seriously doubt that an impeachment would get off the ground, based upon prior to the election conduct by Mrs. Clinton. You would not even get a majority of Republicans to vote for it. Meanwhile, Mrs. Clinton would continue the destructive flood across the Southern border, that has characterized the last three Administrations.

The realistic place to raise the issues of the Clinton past, is now--in the Trump campaign. That is where those issues will truly resonate; and nothing illustrates the writer's confusion, more clearly, than his willingness to write off the one place where his attack on Mrs. Clinton makes sense.

And see Trump: The Issue.

Trump is the answer! Damn the lies & Damn the liars! Full speed ahead!

99 posted on 08/11/2016 8:43:07 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The people have spoken
I couldn’t get past the first sentence.

I got to the third sentence, where he pretends that we have a Republican House and Senate. :)

100 posted on 08/11/2016 8:44:11 AM PDT by kiryandil (Hillary Clinton is not sophisticated enough to understand the Bill of Rights, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson