Probably just a tad high on the D side, 7.2% F over M lead?
Doesn’t seem accurate.
Now, what I noticed is that in OH, Suffolk asked for the “youngest voter in the home.” MASSIVE fraud. I notice on this poll-—(ahem, after I brought this up repeatedly on social media)-—they don’t say that. But is this still their methodology? If so, garbage.
Either way, this will bump up the RCP average in FL by a couple toward Cankles. Trump led there just two days ago by a fraction.
> Respondents in the household were selected by initially asking for the youngest adult.
Oh?
Lots and lots of special sauce go into the selection process. I strongly doubt that the sample is anywhere within standard deviation of “likely voter” by anyone else’s definition.