Posted on 07/30/2016 6:35:08 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
Republican strategist, lobbyist, and Donald Trump confidante Roger Stone joined Breitbart‘s Milo Yiannopoulos to discuss voter fraud and how Trump has the ability to beat it.
“I think your audience knows, I think we all know, that in this day and age, a computer can do anything. These voter machines are essentially a computer. Who is to say they could not be rigged?” asked Stone on the topic of voter fraud.
“Of course they can. Now, you ask me why the Republicans don’t do it, but sadly I think they do,” Stone said. “That’s why I briefly had to leave the Republican Party and become a Libertarian.”
“I have no doubt that after the last election, when Karl Rove, who was George Bush’s campaign manager and a Romney partisan, insisted that ‘no no, your numbers have to be wrong,’ he said on Fox, ‘Romney definitely carried Ohio,’ and the reason he was so certain is because it was bought and paid for,” he claimed. “He knew the fix was supposed to be in. Therefore I can only conclude that sometimes things don’t stay bought, and perhaps Obama came in with a better offer.”
“This stuff is going to horrify most voters, I mean this is amazing,” added Yiannopoulos.
“There’s a mathematician called Richard Charnin, a very eccentric fellow. Last time I met him he was wearing a ski jacket in 90 degree weather, he’s one of those. He’s also brilliant,” replied Stone.
“He’s a retired mathematician and he’s a genius. He’s written an extensive monograph on how every election in the state of Wisconsin in the last decade has been stolen, and you figure this out by comparing the polling, on a district by district basis, to the results, and then you’ll find a swing that is mathematically impossible,”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I’m here in Georgia. Will Trump expose how Republican Secretary of State Brian Kemp took HAVA money so he wouldn’t be accountable to the legislature? Will Trump expose how Kemp’s staff, after approving Dodds people for the software contract, took juicy jobs with the contractor to sell the contractor to other Republican election officials? Will Trump expose how Kemp fired scapegoat Gary when it was Kemp’s Democrat contractor who made the error and not Gary? Will Trump expose that much of the software was developed in India despite Georgia law that says it has to be developed in the USA? Will Trump expose the fact that those Indian developers had no clue as to how elections are run in the USA and especially in Georgia? Will Trump expose that the Indian developers were some of the lowest skilled Indians, far less skilled than those that contract with private companies in the US?
Will Trump exposed that when vote problems occur and the local county election officials are blamed that they are falsely blamed and it is Kemp who imposed on the County officials the HAVA funded Indian developed software that does not work?
Will Trump expose that when there are so many bugs in the software and so many defects in the data, that work arounds are inevitable. And these work-arounds are the devils playground, even though they are well-intentioned.
When the voter line gets extremely long because the software doesn’t work, the local election officials have the choice of a) preventing people from voting and getting charged with that or b) going around the software and just letting everyone vote, which admittedly allows some to vote on behalf of friends and family...like their neighbors who have moved away.
This is a God-sized problem to solve.
I remember when we got a new, and hackable, email system at work. I and others complained until we were blue in the face. It ended only when someone sent the big boss greetings from “Santa Claus”.
Maybe if a serious tone doesn’t get the point across, a different approach might be in order.
I really liked how the UK did the Brexit vote. First they counted how many votes there were, and published that, say 100,005, THEN they tallied the votes, ensuring that no extra ballots were found in trunks of cars.
Fool proof? No, but it would go a long way.
The GOP is barred, BY LAW, from challenging voter fraud, just so everyone knows:
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/news/la-pn-supreme-court-rnc-voter-fraud-20130114
The problem with an invalid result in the general election is that where do we go from there? If such a thing happened in the Aug 30 Arizona election you at least have plenty of intact offices left, but in the general we would be in uncharted waters.
Republicans went proactive in districts known to have a high incidence of fraud. But since said neighborhoods were majority minority population, they were slapped down for it.
This is concerning - if Hillary wins and they find fraud later (which they will), it’s too late.
ping
Expose vote fraud ASAP! Loudly and frequently!!
As an aside, this is another example of how, for some damn reason, we cannot rightfully criticize the rats with adding some self deprecating comments about how we all probably do it. Let’s not do that anymore. We can criticize BO without saying that GWB was no genius.
Stone hurts his case by saying Ohio was bought by the Bushes. If he talked about precincts in Philadelphia being near 100% for Obama, then that would be better.
Exactly and he should do it now!!!
Call it out as known truth and also Diebold!
The mathematician Charnin whom Stone refers to writes almost entirely about Republican vote-fixing via machines and voter suppression. What is going on here?
Just received this:
Clinton Foundation
bkmk
Mr. Trump needs to form a huge Vote Counter-Fraud operation with at least 500 lawyers and thousands of volunteers standing by on Election Day. It should be run by John Fund and Hans Von Spakovsky, two experts in voter fraud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.