Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The creator of ‘USA Freedom Kids’ now plans to sue campaign
Washington Post ^ | 7/26/16 | Philip Bump

Posted on 07/26/2016 10:12:52 AM PDT by Sopater

FULL TITLE: The creator of the viral pro-Trump act ‘USA Freedom Kids’ now plans to sue the campaign

Within hours of their performance at a Donald Trump rally in Pensacola, Fla., last January, the U.S.A. Freedom Kids were a sensation.

You remember the video: Three preteen girls in star-spangled outfits crisply working through simple choreography as they lip-synced an upbeat update to "Over There."

That infectious performance kicked off a flurry of media appearances. The Freedom Kids told "Inside Edition" that Trump told them that he planned to listen to their CD all night. The group, which had been around for about 2½ years by that point, was a viral sensation largely inextricable from Trump himself.

Now, though, the relationship is different. Jeff Popick, father of the smallest Freedom Kid and author of "Freedom's Call" (the song performed at the Trump rally), told The Washington Post by phone on Monday that he planned to file a lawsuit against the campaign for violating its agreement with the group.

"This is not a billion-dollar lawsuit," Popick said. "I'm doing this because I think they have to do the right thing. And if this means having to go through the court system to enforce them doing the right thing, then that's what I have to do. I'm not looking to do battle with the Trump campaign, but I have to show my girls that this is the right thing."

Popick is quick to explain that the agreement was not written down, but, instead, involves promises from various agents of the Trump campaign which he says were then broken.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fl2016; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last



1 posted on 07/26/2016 10:12:52 AM PDT by Sopater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Ungrateful people. A little recognition and now they want litigation.


2 posted on 07/26/2016 10:14:51 AM PDT by Reno89519 (It is very simple, Trump/Pence or Clinton/Kaine. Good riddance Lyn' Ted, we regret ever knowing you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

What a joke. Tons of free publicity and this whiner goes to the liberal media.

Pathetic.


3 posted on 07/26/2016 10:15:56 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

The father must need cash bad. This is sad and stupid on his part.


4 posted on 07/26/2016 10:17:39 AM PDT by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

[Popick is quick to explain that the agreement was not written down, but, instead, involves promises from various agents]

Yep... sounds legit to me! / sarc

What kind of idiot these days agrees to something without it in writing?


5 posted on 07/26/2016 10:18:45 AM PDT by ObozoMustGo2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012
What kind of idiot these days agrees to something without it in writing?

The Trump campaign, evidently.
6 posted on 07/26/2016 10:19:59 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Democrats hate too much

[The father must need cash bad. This is sad and stupid on his part.]

Considering he takes gigs without written contract, he’s probably a degenerate gambler and blew the groups money at the track.


7 posted on 07/26/2016 10:20:11 AM PDT by ObozoMustGo2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

[The Trump campaign, evidently. ]

In this case, it’s the father’s word against Trump org. He’s at a disadvantage.


8 posted on 07/26/2016 10:21:13 AM PDT by ObozoMustGo2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
"The first event didn't come to fruition, and Popick says he asked for $2,500 in payment for the second performance, in Pensacola. The campaign made a counter-offer: How about a table where the group could presell albums? Popick took the deal. When they arrived at the venue, though, there was no table"

-Wow. It's about a table. There is serious stuff going on and serious sacrifices. The dad just got too caught up in all of this. The kids probably act more like an adult then the dad.


9 posted on 07/26/2016 10:21:39 AM PDT by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012
Considering he takes gigs without written contract, he’s probably a degenerate gambler and blew the groups money at the track.

When I was a kid, a handshake agreement was considered as binding as the paper it eventually got written upon. But darned few went all the way to mutual satisfaction without something written.

10 posted on 07/26/2016 10:24:17 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Democrats hate too much

[When they arrived at the venue, though, there was no table”]

Was it too hard for him to flag down an event manager and inquire about the table???


11 posted on 07/26/2016 10:25:20 AM PDT by ObozoMustGo2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Who knows... how on earth does one expect to win a suit on the basis of unrecorded promises.

He might instead teach his girls that if you want it to be enforceable, put it in writing.


12 posted on 07/26/2016 10:25:20 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Well, I can see this happening given the way campaigns go. In all honestly if this isn’t a Dem plant it would have made a lot more sense to cut the guy a check for 10 grand and make this go away rather than it get to this point....unless it is a complete fabrication...but even then...


13 posted on 07/26/2016 10:25:26 AM PDT by Crimson Elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519; SoFloFreeper

If they were to perform in exchange for publicity, then that should have been the terms that were agreed upon. It sounds like all they wanted in exchange was a venue to sell their albums.

A “word” used to be sufficient among gentlemen.


14 posted on 07/26/2016 10:26:23 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012
In this case, it’s the father’s word against Trump org. He’s at a disadvantage.

True, because he has already kept his end of the bargain.
15 posted on 07/26/2016 10:27:17 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Who knows... how on earth does one expect to win a suit on the basis of unrecorded promises.

He might instead teach his girls that if you want it to be enforceable, put it in writing.


In all honesty, I expect that this is indeed the lesson that will come out of all this.
16 posted on 07/26/2016 10:28:49 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Maybe the Trump team can work a quid pro quo of some other kind. Will they let the work be sold in future with the Trump name on it, in exchange for the table that had been forgotten? This might even have been negotiated without need for suing.


17 posted on 07/26/2016 10:29:40 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Popick is quick to explain that the agreement was not written down

Err ... um ...

Guess he never heard the one about the verbal agreement not being worth the paper it's printed on.

Another stupid Washington Post "Gotcha!" piece.

18 posted on 07/26/2016 10:30:26 AM PDT by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

And people will ultimately view it as a “he said she said who knows” issue.


19 posted on 07/26/2016 10:31:53 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

If the agreements were verbal, hate to break this to poppa, right or wrong, legally you are going to lose.

A verbal agreement is only worth the paper its not written down on.


20 posted on 07/26/2016 10:33:59 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson