Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TV Ratings: Donald Trump's RNC Speech Tops Romney With 32 Million Viewers, Falls Far Short of McCain
Hollywood Reporter ^ | 7/22/2016 | Michael O'Connell

Posted on 07/23/2016 6:34:12 AM PDT by usafa92

The Republican National Convention clearly reached its crescendo on Thursday night. The four-day run-up until Donald Trump's accepting of the nomination, while giving a strong ratings performance, did not bring any atypical highs for the political meetup. Trump's speech didn't change that narrative by much.

With all three broadcast networks and cable news networks now tallied for the 10 p.m. hour, it appears just over 32 million viewers tuned into Trump's extended time on stage.

On the broadcast networks alone Thursday night, Trump's time on the stage brought in 12.3 million viewers to the 10 o'clock hour on through the speech's conclusion at 11:37 p.m. ET. NBC News led its fourth and final night of primetime coverage with an average 4.6 million viewers tuning in, per Nielsen Media's Fast Affiliate ratings. ABC News, which preciously topped CBS on Monday, averaged 3.9 million viewers. CBS News took 3.8 million viewers. Spanish-language net Univision contributed another 1.3 million viewers.

Cable news brought the biggest lifts — particularly for Fox News Channel and CNN. FNC, a favorite for right-leaning audiences, topped them all with 9.4 million viewers. And CNN, hitting an all-time high for its RNC coverage, also topped all of the broadcast networks with 5.5 million viewers. MSNBC, trailing, averaged 2.95 million viewers. (Nielsen's delivery of the 32-million stat also includes Fox Business Network, CNBC and NBC Universo.)

Prior to Thursday, the broadcast networks have been contributing in the area of 10 million viewers to gross RNC ratings. The cable news aggregate typically topped that showing by a million-or-so viewers. High ratings have certainly the candidate's mind. His latest tweet, as of Friday morning, crowed about the RNC ratings. But it is now clear his ratings record-breaking is limited to debate appearances.

To prove to be a bigger draw than RNC headliners of the recent past, Trump's final tally would need to be higher than 30.3 million to top Mitt Romney in 2012. The candidate already has that in the bag. But with nearly 40 million viewers tuning into John McCain in 2008, that showing will not be matched.

The TV race in the key news demographic of adults 25-54 saw rankings for total viewership hold. FNC (2.5 million) and CNN (1.9 million) topped them all, with NBC News (1.8 million) leading broadcast coverage. ABC (1.4 million), CBS (1.2 million) and MSNBC (927,000) followed.

Prior to Thursday, the 2016 RNC had been averaging 22 million viewers across eight ad-supported networks. That number is off a little, given the 1 million or so watching on PBS and a few other nets each night, but pretty accurate. And tracking down from 2008.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 2016rncconvention; ratings; romney; top10; trump; trump2016; trumprncspeech; tvratings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
Ratings are out. I didnt see anything posted on this previously, Media is giddy that he didn't top McCain, but 2008 in media was different than 2016, just 8 years later. For example, I watched most of the convention on my IPad, streamed it from the RNC. Plus, I don't think this accounts for C-SPAN or the millions that will re-watch on YouTube. Just doing a quick tally on the top hits on YouTube is about another million viewers.
1 posted on 07/23/2016 6:34:12 AM PDT by usafa92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: usafa92

I watched it on Right Side News, streamed from their YouTube account.


2 posted on 07/23/2016 6:36:43 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (If 0bama had a son...he would be killing people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

Exactly. Everyone I knew live streamed it because the cable networks weren’t showing all the speakers. This is just more wishful thinking by the left leaning mainstream media.


3 posted on 07/23/2016 6:38:02 AM PDT by Nicojones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

I watched on C-SPAN, gavel to gavel.


4 posted on 07/23/2016 6:38:11 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

I haven’t had cable for 10 years. I watched LIVE on youtube.

They can be “giddy” about the numbers all they want. They are lower because their industry is in decline.


5 posted on 07/23/2016 6:38:41 AM PDT by americas.best.days... ( I think we can now say that they are behind us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

Save this story for when the ratings for Hillary’s speech come out. I bet the spin will be a little ... different.


6 posted on 07/23/2016 6:38:51 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

I was just going to point that out.this DOES NOT account for those who watched on CSPAN......We could not stand all the talking heads who were not showing each speech so we watched on CSPAN........as many did soooooooo Media spins things again it would appear


7 posted on 07/23/2016 6:39:58 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

Yup. How many streamed Trump? Millions.


8 posted on 07/23/2016 6:39:59 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

Millennial me, I don’t have a TV, guess I don’t count.
I watched on youtube and cspan.


9 posted on 07/23/2016 6:40:04 AM PDT by Buttons12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Same here....ONLY C-Span. The cable news networks all talked over the speakers/events.

I wonder what C-Span’s viewership count was.


10 posted on 07/23/2016 6:40:05 AM PDT by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

You’re right, the comparison between 2008 and 2016 doesn’t account for the fact that television is quickly becoming yesterday’s medium, especially among those of us who can’t stand the asinine MSM talking heads.


11 posted on 07/23/2016 6:41:23 AM PDT by Genoa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

We DVR’d CSPAN all four days.


12 posted on 07/23/2016 6:41:33 AM PDT by BBB333 (Q: Which is grammatically correct? Joe Biden IS or Joe Biden ARE an idiot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

I think you are right. I only watched the convention on TV on Fri. The rest of the week, I went over the speeches from Utube links the following morning.

I was very disappointed with the coverage on TV cable, Fox. Just talking heads, leaving out speaker after speaker, not even announcing who was at the lectern.

If you want to see and hear most of the speeches, you have to use Utube or CSPAN or streaming.


13 posted on 07/23/2016 6:41:41 AM PDT by AMDG&BVMH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

OANN did a good job. Some commentary while the band played, but nothing during the speeches.


14 posted on 07/23/2016 6:43:00 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nicojones

I did not watch one frigging bit of it that was sourced by any ‘network’ like ABC,CBS, NBC, CNN or Fox. They are all dead to me. Their BS background, commentary and opinions are lies and manipulation of the truth as far as I’m concerned.


15 posted on 07/23/2016 6:43:16 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

Yeah, I watched it on YouTube.

No doubt lots more people watching online than 8 years ago.


16 posted on 07/23/2016 6:44:04 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Didn’t find any C-SPAN numbers. But, PBS said it averaged 2.3 million viewers, not included in the ratings.


17 posted on 07/23/2016 6:44:08 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
I was just going to point that out.this DOES NOT account for those who watched on CSPAN......We could not stand all the talking heads who were not showing each speech so we watched on CSPAN........as many did soooooooo Media spins things again it would appear

I too watched CSPAN to get around the talking heads. I thought CSPANS camera work was excellent with their many crowd shots. They really captured the essence of the convention.

18 posted on 07/23/2016 6:45:12 AM PDT by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

that’s because more people watched online this time..

less people have TVs than in McCain’s year..2008..

they can measure how many people were online instead of guessing the TV ratings using Nelson...

Plus many people could have watched the video later online instead of LIVE...

I was tired myself and went to bed at 7.30PM and watched the CSPAN video online hours later..

this article means nothing..


19 posted on 07/23/2016 6:45:17 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usafa92
Sarah Palin photo: Sarah Palin l_87700fac3cd44f7f8b213edc25530d28.jpg
20 posted on 07/23/2016 6:45:40 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson