To: proust; ViLaLuz; ROCKLOBSTER; BlessedBeGod; Kevin in California; Kenny; vpintheak; Rurudyne; ...
The title of that story does not match its content. Inside the article, it quotes Assange as saying an indictment is impossible to happen...
Assange expressed a lack of confidence in the Obama administration’s Justice Department to indict the former Secretary of State.
“[Attorney General Loretta Lynch] is not going to indict Hillary Clinton. It’s not possible that could happen.
But the FBI could push for new concessions from the Clinton government in exchange for its lack of indictment.”
130 posted on
07/23/2016 8:13:00 AM PDT by
Future Useless Eater
(Obama wants nuclear war with RU or NK by October. How would Americans know who REALLY started it?)
To: Future Useless Eater
So nothing more than click bait is what we have here. Do they not realize this will actually have a negative effect on their traffic?
To: Future Useless Eater
132 posted on
07/23/2016 8:22:08 AM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true ... and it ticks people off)
To: Future Useless Eater
I would agree Lynch won’t indict, but if Clinton isn’t pardoned before Trump takes office, odds are good that Trump does.
133 posted on
07/23/2016 9:01:44 AM PDT by
HombreSecreto
(The life of a repo man is always intense)
To: Future Useless Eater
We agree. Under the current administration there will be no indictment.
142 posted on
07/23/2016 10:37:32 AM PDT by
SisterK
(its a spiritual war)
To: Future Useless Eater
What, do you expect us to actually
read an article before we comment on it?!?!
/s, LOL, and :-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
