Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cornfedcowboy

Ask yourself this. Would anyone on Trump’s side have approved a nearly twenty-five minute ramble from a guy who refused to endorse the candidate? Who else, outside of keynote speakers, was approved to talk so long? (For that matter, what other speaker was approved who didn’t support Trump? Cruz supporters seem to think that special rules apply to Cruz. Obots think the same thing about Obama.)

Then ask yourself where Newt got the idea Cruz’ speech in fact included an endorsement? Here is the line Newt was supposed to deliver, from his prepared remarks:

“Senator Ted Cruz in particular made the key point that we need to elect the Trump-Pence Republican ticket.”

Cruz is not a man of his word. To this day he’s lying nonstop about what Trump “said,” about Heidi. He’s simply a deceitful person.

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/gingrich-rnc-speech-originally-referenced-cruz-endorsement-of-trump-report/


172 posted on 07/22/2016 12:27:53 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: Fantasywriter

I heard Trump himself say that he knew Cruz wasn’t going to endorse him in his speech and he said let him go on anyway.

Once he said he wasn’t going to endorse him he shouldn’t have let him speak. Primetime airtime is very valuable during the convention. Trump could have used that 30 minutes for someone who did business with him, or charities he helped, or middle class workers who worked for him, etc.


183 posted on 07/22/2016 4:17:47 PM PDT by Beernoser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson