National Review article that praises DJ Trump? Pinch me!
“National Review?, said something nice about Trump? Amazing.
“National Review” , said something nice about Trump? Amazing.
>> France has been an American ally for about 250 years.
Yes, she has, and still is.
Still, the VP is a minor play: bunt single, sac fly.
Unless he can thrash Hillary’s VP pick.
No they got an establishment GOPe a heartbeat away from the Presidency. You do not get get rid of the venom of NR has been spewing at Trump throughout the campaign and now “sing” Trump’s praises? BS!
Need to ban Muslims, send the ones here by Obama back to their countries of origin.
Build the wall!
Obviously the Coup has failed.
Who denies us overflight rights. Some friend. Look, I feel sorry for the French. But they are no friends of ours.
Kudlow was the host in the 2006 video where Steve King explained to his friend the humble Mike Pence why his touchback amnesty bill was a bad idea.
I support Mike Pence in part because at that. We’ve had to deal with smirking Rand Paul & Ted Cruz with their BS on immigration.
Don’t fool yourself i am french , living in France , and i can tell that Hollande is a nut and an UTTER DHIMMY MUSLIM-FRIENDLY .
Obama and UE , most of european politicians are croocked globalist dhimmies who steadily and deliberatly want to allow and increase a big muslim immigration , ie crowds receiving benefits and future voters .....
For those political croocks , certainly receiving dirty funds from Qatar and Saudi Arabia , the obvious goal is also to weaken and our culture , civilization , identity , unity and , as consequence , our strength ;
hOLLANDE is a cynical lame duck who doesn’t want to fight the war that worldwide islam declared and launched against us
I wonder if national review will go bankrupt.
What are they going to write now?
And now I’m worried. Neo-cons saying nice things about Trump is not what I want to hear.
The are certain legal and civil considerations for a formal DoW that can cause problems. A DoW has not been declared since WWII. It triggers all sorts of legal clauses, e.g. in contracts and insurance policies, many of which will not pay out during a declared war. This is part of the reason why the Korean War, Vietnam War, and the Gulf Wars all used an Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) instead. An AUMF has fewer undesirable side effects.
Declaring war on ISIS and terrorism is also declaring war on the American legal profession that wants the situation to remain a law enforcement problem
Breitbart (h/t Emma) Last year, Obama directed his administration to accept at least 10,000 Syrian refugees over the course of this fiscal year (but has since raised it to 100,000). However, Clinton said that Obamas plan did not go nearly far enough Clinton called for a 500% increase to Obamas refugee resettlement operation.
Elect Hillary and we are done for.
.
While this is a good first step, history shows us that it will eventually have to be a declaration of war against all of Islam. Islam is what produces these groups and that will never change. Only the names of the terror groups will change while the ideology remains the same.
Actually it was a hat trick with the statement “We are the Law and Order Candidates”.
When trump was interviewed with pence by a liberal deadbeat she asked so you will go to war, he sed no I will win
National Review is dead to me....
They’ve shown their colors....
They could write fantastic and Yuge articles about Trump and they still would be dead to me..