Lynch says: Fed records laws not clear cut

Congressional Hearing | 7/12/16

[dontreadthis]

Atty Genl Lynch testified today that it is NOT necessarily illegal to share classified material with an individual without security clearance

[rktman]

And, did you comprehend your duties and responsibilities? And possible consequences of violating those? I’m guessin you “got” it. Geez you would think someone(hildabeast) that has spent that much time in the halls of power would have the comprehension skills to “get” it. Don’t believe I want some one with ZERO comprehension skill running the country.

[Cheerio]

Does anyone seriously think Loertta would utter such a statement if GWB was the President. This is beyond ridiculous and needs to just stop. I hope when Pres Trump is in the oval office that he will sic his DOJ and FBI onto the Klintoon sleaze foundation like a pit bull. THEY ARE NOT ABOVE THE LAW.

[Diogenesis]

Lynch admitted she had knowledge of US security secrets
going to Enemies of the USA and the Constitution.

Lynch admitted KNOWLEDGE of treason.

And the GOP yawned, and collected their silver.

[ctdonath2]

Absolute grounds for impeachment.

[justa-hairyape]

They why have people been jailed over those laws ?

[Colo9250]

So why don’t the republicans start immediate impeachment proceedings? It is obvious that she incompetent and has no intent to uphold her oath of office. You know like they did to the IRS comish! Oh wait, I forgot.

[LostPassword]

> it is NOT necessarily illegal to share classified material with an individual without security clearance

It depends on the letter by the individual’s name.
R - illegal
D - legal

[Cheerio]

between Obammy and Loretta LynchMob,, this nation has been taken over by idiots CRIMINALS who could care less about the rule of law.

There is my version of your comment.

[rjsimmon]

Atty Genl Lynch testified today that it is NOT necessarily illegal to share classified material with an individual without security clearance

Yes, yes it is.

[Ann Archy]

STupid or CORRUPT or BOTH for the LYNCHSTER!!

[RetSignman]

Obama...”It is not clear what the motives of the shooter were...”

[combat_boots]

Anyone here would be hauled off in a no knock warrant and held in perpetuity for doing this.

[Boogieman]

Because the government is corrupt.

[Boogieman]

Well technically she is correct. It depends on whether there was malicious intent or collaboration with some foreign entity, if we are only talking about disseminating the classified information, separate from the issue of the mishandling of the information on a private server.

[tumblindice]

illegal, undocumented; classified, not classified
What’s the difference? say the lawless Obamanites.

[tumblindice]

Cpmey: `No one has been prosecuted under this musty, dusty old law ... except for a bunch of nobodies.’

[SMARTY]

Huh...?

[SMARTY]

Rope ‘a dope!

[Bluebird Singing]

Yes, it is! But when it comes to Hillary, or any other theoretical case that she can’t talk about, Lynch views laws as guidance . . . Can someone tell me how she qualifies to be Attorney General?

[mbynack]

She’s correct. There are exceptions to the rules that are spelled out in the law. If a person without a clearance requires one-time or short-term access to classified material in order to perform their job, it can be granted by the original classification authority for the material they need to access. It’s in the books, but I never saw it used because no one ever wanted to be the one held responsible.