Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/12/2016 2:50:01 AM PDT by Dundee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Dundee
"A new Philippine leader who appears friendlier to Beijing could also influence the aftermath of the ruling...."

This won't happen if they want to have a 'friendlier' ...next President.

2 posted on 07/12/2016 2:56:27 AM PDT by Mr Apple ( google clinton national security scandal and coverup / google alamo-girl.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee

They won’t care. They will ignore it


3 posted on 07/12/2016 3:01:32 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee
God does not work only with WASPS and Americans ... HE's got a pretty soft spot for the Philippines, too.

Enter Duterte.

4 posted on 07/12/2016 3:04:08 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true ... and it ticks people off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee
Well!

That's that then.

5 posted on 07/12/2016 3:13:00 AM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee

The Hague has no authority.


7 posted on 07/12/2016 3:40:11 AM PDT by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed (Yahuah Yahusha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee

As if China is in any mood to abide by some old Euro colonial masters who tell them where China’s territory is or isn’t.


10 posted on 07/12/2016 4:05:08 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee

Good

America now must make clear we will stand up to any Chinese aggression against the Philippians or any other our allies.


12 posted on 07/12/2016 4:13:48 AM PDT by StoneWall Brigade ( America's Party! Tom Hoefling/Steve Schulin 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee

The ruling is the death knell of the court

having no means to enforce the judgement, the court is shown to be a farce


16 posted on 07/12/2016 4:42:14 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee

China will just ignore this. Like their pets, the Clintons, laws are for little peoples.


18 posted on 07/12/2016 5:48:12 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee

Let the fun begin.


20 posted on 07/12/2016 6:02:04 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee

Uh oh.


21 posted on 07/12/2016 6:08:04 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee

Why doesn’t the US just provide technical know-how and support and equipment to the countries disputing China’s claim so that they can do the same thing China is doing and built their own island up and militarize them?

Match China move for move and tit for tat.

Then China will be in the same position of whether or not to try and attack a fortified island.


28 posted on 07/12/2016 7:14:14 AM PDT by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee

In the aftermath of the lawless, 3rd-world, banana republic
ruling in Hillary’s email matter, this US administration has NO moral authority telling China (or any other country) what to do.


29 posted on 07/12/2016 7:14:57 AM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee

“Now let him enforce it.”


33 posted on 07/12/2016 7:53:06 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee
From NY Times:

But while the decision is legally binding, there is no mechanism for enforcing it, and China, which refused to participate in the tribunal’s proceedings, reiterated on Tuesday that it would not abide by it. “The award is invalid and has no binding force,” the Foreign Ministry said in a statement. “China does not accept or recognize it.”
This makes more sense. I couldn't believe China ever agreed to this and it turns out they didn't.

I do, though, think other's comments that China signed on to recognize this authority is the problem.

My opinion is that the Court is clearly correct in that China does not own the entire South China Sea.

But I certainly do not recognize that court's authority.

36 posted on 07/12/2016 9:02:16 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dundee
Chinese will ignore the court and continue to expand their influence and control, unhindered by the enfeebled United States.
45 posted on 07/14/2016 2:33:55 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson