Yeah I read it. Ryan is a phony. Can’t believe anything he says. All these guys including Trump need to get their act together to defeat Hillary.
““I wasn’t particularly impressed,” said Sanford. “It was the normal stream of consciousness that’s long on hyperbole and short on facts. At one point, somebody asked about Article I powers: What will you do to protect them? I think his response was, ‘I want to protect Article I, Article II, Article XII,’ going down the list. There is no Article XII.”
Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-Va.), who said he was “uncomfortable” with Trump’s language, gave him a pass on the Constitution flub. “When he made the comment about the Constitution, I love this Article and that Article, I assumed he was talking about the Amendments, because he was off on the numbers,” he said.
But both Griffith and Sanford tempered their criticism, contrasting Trump’s sometimes slipshod approach to Clinton’s adroit politicking. “He may be loose on some facts, reckless on some, but there’s not malicious intent there,” said Sanford.
Lol how obvious does it need to be for you to see the question about Article 1 is a gotcha question asked by a no trumper?
Sure I believe Ryan here because. I KNOW he dislikes Trump and yet spoke favorably about the meeting.
In any case a simple reading of the entire wapo ztory shows it to be an air ball, a nothing story meNt to paaint a picture of dissension among the ranks of Rep and that is not new and it is also meant to draw attn away from Clintons disastor of Tues and today.