Posted on 07/07/2016 6:36:13 AM PDT by SE Mom
Hillary Clinton Email Investigation FBI Director James Comey testifies before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on the FBI’s investigation into Hillary…
(Excerpt) Read more at c-span.org ...
The media isn’t even demanding she answer their questions this is just sick... imagine if she were Republican...
yes Hillary had “intent” to break the law every step of the way
Tomorrow. It was a joke about dragging out the hearing.
And even that time, the charge was not taken to trial. It was dropped, the focus of the case was redirected to a different statute.
I'm curious if anybody will bring up 18 USC 1924(a).
[The Republican controlled committee gives more time on camera for Hillary’s damage control.]
In an act pure desperation, did Comey ASK for this hearing in an effort to save his a$$?
“Maloney bringing in Trump.”
She’s all over the place. Dems are just looking for campaign sound bites.
`if you can’t dazzle em with facts, baffle em w/ BS.’
Jim is repeating Trey’s points.
He said he had a plane to catch TOMORROW!
He was being sarcastic.
Gowdy did a great job....yes or no.....the questions included:
“Did Hillary erase any work emails from her computer?”
GUESS WHAT COMEY SAID? “YES”!!!
“Did Hillary have her lawyers review all of the emails they were culling?”
GUESS WHAT COMEY SAID? “YES”
“Did Hillary use multiple servers?”
GUESS WHAT COMEY SAID?
“YES”!!!
go Jim Jordan....
Comey said “consider the context” .... Jordan: what does this mean? usually that’s brought up by defense in sentencing phase
It was a dumb joke by Gowdy. He had great ammo and fired it into the ground. He should have hammered Comey on the intent issue.
If nothing else Comey is saying Hillary is stooooooopid.
To give people the impression Congress takes seriously, the canard that this is a country of laws.
You would if it was a former First Lady
You would if this former First Lady was the Secretary of State
You would if this person was a Yale-educated lawyer.
You would if this person was running for President.
You would if these people were accused of running a quid pro quo shadow government under the disguise of the Clinton Family Foundation.
Comey’s answers don’t pass the smell test when framed in that fashion.
However, you would not do this if 50% of the people currently in DC are also complicit in these activities.
Congressmen must ask questions not prattle on and on
The attempt to get an NSA secured phone (like Obama), then being turned down, shows she was ticked off and pursued her own solution. IMO. Wish this would be brought up.
Love the way Jordan said ‘context.’
Chaffetz was the best. He asked pointed questions and made Comey answer and squirm. The other guys are grandstanding
Comrade Hellry was turned down for a NSA secured phone?
YES
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/emails-show-nsa-rejected-hillary-clinton-request-for-secure-smartphone/
"A nation of men, not laws." Comparing the federal govt's treatment of Hillary to how they treated a Navy classmate. https://t.co/JNGOUMnGpu— jon gabriel (@exjon) July 5, 2016
@DailyCaller @HouseCracka “no reasonable prosecutor” would bring charges against her. But he was reasonable for ONE sentence? 2Big2JailHRC— Slip Stream News (@GaryZPon) July 6, 2016
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.