Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner

Here’s the money quote:

“The FBI has told the public that because Mrs. Clinton did not have intent to harm the United States we should not prosecute her on a felony that does not require proof of intent to harm the United States. Meanwhile, although there may have been profound harm to national security caused by her grossly negligent mishandling of classified information, we’ve decided she shouldn’t be prosecuted for grossly negligent mishandling of classified information.”

Intent isn’t even supposed to be a consideration, yet that is what he is using to excuse her. If intention can be considered, why are they still chasing Ed Snowden? How is his case any different than hers?


26 posted on 07/05/2016 10:34:32 AM PDT by Gunpowder green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gunpowder green
Intent isn’t even supposed to be a consideration, yet that is what he is using to excuse her. If intention can be considered, why are they still chasing Ed Snowden? How is his case any different than hers?

The "Law" Is In Their Mouth

Edward Snowden knew what a crowd of criminal scum the federal Praetorians are. He took appropriate precautions...
80 posted on 07/05/2016 11:00:38 AM PDT by kiryandil (To the GOPee: "Giving the Democrats the Supreme Court means you ARE the Democrats.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson