To: CWW
Do the laws involved require bad MOTIVES? What a sham.
14 posted on
07/05/2016 8:15:53 AM PDT by
aimhigh
(1 John 3:23)
To: aimhigh
Amen! So everyone ever convicted of negligence in this nation should be screaming for a new trial.
81 posted on
07/05/2016 8:19:41 AM PDT by
Darnright
(When a system acts illegally, its dictates are not the law of the land, they are the law of force)
To: aimhigh
“Do the laws involved require bad MOTIVES? What a sham.”
Useless answer: No. Motive is not mentioned in 18 USC. You either maintain security or immediately report any breach. Period.
To: aimhigh
No. Gross negligence under the federal statute is enough for a felony conviction.
What the director described perfectly fits the definition of gross negligence.
To: aimhigh
Do the laws involved require bad MOTIVES? No. The laws speak to actions, not intentions.
459 posted on
07/05/2016 9:05:46 AM PDT by
NorthMountain
(A plague o' both your houses.)
To: aimhigh
No influential was required.
468 posted on
07/05/2016 9:07:41 AM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson