Posted on 06/29/2016 1:26:33 PM PDT by jazusamo
Nothing will happen to either of these women except they will get fatter pocketbooks. So sick of these people and I do hope they get what’s coming to them... in spades.
Congress does nothing when treason is committed against the American people, our security, and our future. What can We The People do when treason is committed and Congress does NOTHING???
Indeed.
The whole function of government is SUPPOSED to be “to provide for the common defense and promote the general welfare” of its citizens.
Yes they do do something. They aid and abet it. Also, they protect , shield, and defend those committing the treasonous acts. For a generous cut of the loot , of course. Why do you think that they are working 24/7/365 to disarm us?
Check and see if Obama also had connections to these banks. Particularly Shore Bank
Over 100 objections and a whole lot of don’t-recalls.
That does sound familiar doesn’t it...ok will do...
Thanks...Now Hillary wants to move on, of course she does. lol
There's nothing new that I noticed, other than the existence of an SSHRC@STATE.GOV account. This was apparently Hillary's actual state.gov email, but was only used for announcements -- most likely sent by someone else.
Abedin says she was never briefed on her obligation to comply with the FOIA.
She did say that she attempted to conduct all of her State Dept. business on her State.gov account, but admits there were instances where it "bled over" into her personal address on clintonemail.com. Since Clinton was using that domain exclusively, it would have never been archived.
ROFL...yep, but I’ve got a bunch more stuff on her...
Yes, Huma's attorney's lodged some sort of objection to every question. But, they only instructed her to not answer for a few questions, and most of them were about discussions with her legal counsel in preparation for the deposition.
I was surprised at how many times she didn't recall something until shown email she wrote. I thought my memory was getting bad, but I certainly remember email that I sent.
Who is in charge of revoking her security clearance?
Appreciate your posting that, I’ve only read about a third of it so far. At least what little is brought out in these deps is on record under oath.
LOL! Hildabama. Guess where that’s goin’. And, how do these people get “instantly” vetted? I remember it taking up to 6 months to get a clearance. Guess I ain’t so special after all huh?
You can read it a lot faster if you skip every sentence that begins with "objection". :-)
There's really no evidence of wrongdoing, other than the systemic failure to comply with the requirements of the FOIA. But, we already knew that. And, with no effective penalties for a political appointee, it's a moot point anyway.
Huma was asked directly if Hillary used the server to intentionally evade the FOIA, and she said "no, not to my knowledge". Even the email where Hillary refused a State.gov account was cast as "want to keep personal email private", not any kind of concealment.
Frankly, the only hope of finding a smoking gun is if the FBI got the entire server archive from Clinton's lawyer. But, I don't know if their rules of evidence would allow them to use it -- it may be considered to be outside the scope of the FBI's investigation into leakage of classified information.
I can’t help but think of Danny Casolaro’s octopus
Gosh, that really makes you important. Special too.
You're important and special because you've "got stuff" on Hillary.
Yep. Pretty special.
They will ALL escape Earth’s Judgment, but GOD will get them.
They will ALL escape Earth’s Judgment, but GOD will get them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.