This Happened: Matthews Asks Why Does Terrorism ‘Always Seem to Involve Bombing?’

NewsBusters ^ | 29 Jun 2016 | Curtis Houck

[Rastus]

Terrorists initially would smear themselves in peanut butter in hopes of triggering fatal peanut allergies, but it didn’t seem to work so well. They’re trying bombs, guns, and airplanes now.

[right way right]

Hey Matthews, why does terrorism almost always involve Moooslimbz?

[RipSawyer]

Have you got any o’ them superautomaticlistic, eight guage revolting rifles with the self reloading clips that hold six hundred bullets and fire six times every time you fart?

[MinuteGal]

I also saw that exchange where Matthews was arguing that terrorist bombings "are not sophisticated". The expert he was arguing with finally and abruptly put Chrissie in his place (the dunce corner) with the ins-and-outs of preparations by ISIS, etc. for mass bombing attacks.

And yes, the preparations are planned with sophistication and much forethought.

Motor-Mouth Matthews asks some of the dumbest questions I ever hear from hosts on panel shows....a lot of them he blurts out just to hear the sound of his own beloved voice.

Leni

[bgill]

Because bombs make more of a statement than a bouquet of pansies.

[showme_the_Glory]

triggering fatal peanut allergies

truly diabolical, like sharks with fricken lasers.

[KC Burke]

That super congressman that was on the teevee with the 700 round per minute data should be able to tell you where to buy them — probably at the Trump Casino in the Vatican.

I am specially fond of those fully automatic 8 gauges myself so let me know if you find a two for one sale.

[exDemMom]

MSNBC’s Hardball host Chris Matthews wondered “how much brains does it take” for someone to become a suicide bomber and why do terror attacks “always seem to involve bombing” instead of something else.

It isn't so much that they always use bombs, but that when they shoot up a lot of people, the Democrats blame the guns instead of the terrorists. So, even if 90% of terrorist acts are committed with guns, the liberals only count the 10% that were committed with a bomb.

If they could think of a way to do it, I'm sure that the Democrats would find a way to blame terrorist bombings on anything but the terrorists. Just like they blamed the Benghazi attack not on terrorism, but on an obscure youtube movie. If there is a way to blame an act on anyone other than the perpetrator, the Dems find it.