Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

East Coast states want to tax drivers’ travel, not their gas
Wa Po ^ | June 25, 2016 | Michael Laris

Posted on 06/25/2016 6:18:43 PM PDT by upchuck

Delaware, Pennsylvania, Connecticut and New Hampshire are proposing pilots to figure out how they might charge motorists a fee for the miles they travel — rather than taxing their gas, as state and federal officials do today.

The I-95 Corridor Coalition, which represents transportation officials from 16 states and the District of Columbia, applied for a federal grant last month to test the idea.

Officials would stitch together the policies and technologies needed to count the miles driven by 50 recruits from each of the four states, including state legislators, transportation officials or other willing guinea pigs. They would send out “faux invoices” monthly. And they would collect the data that legislatures — and the driving public — would require to decide if the change makes sense.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: bloodsuckers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

bump


21 posted on 06/25/2016 6:34:54 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
East Coast states want to track drivers’ travel

How much you wanna bet "public servants" get exemptions from this, with more and more of them driving taxpayer-provided cars.

We'll never get to vote on this one. It'll be done by fiat, a fait accompli.

22 posted on 06/25/2016 6:37:23 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Folks need to come out in mass and swamp the steps of their capital buildings and drivers should block the roads around the city as a civil disobidience to this.

No more stupid @$$ wayz to separate folks from their hard earned tax dollars.

Good grief.

23 posted on 06/25/2016 6:38:20 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; BenLurkin; Celerity; Yaelle; kindred
Here is my letter I sent to Oregon papers on GPS as used recently on the latest effort to collect the gas taxes.

From: Retain Mike
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 12:16 PM
To: Lars Larson (talk@larslarson.com)
Subject: FW: Revised: O-DOT Plus GPS Equals KGB

We appear to have resolved the issue of NSA unrestricted data collection, but the Soviet Union's KGB would have greatly profited from technology placing GPS devices in vehicles for gasoline taxes. The devices provide for limitless personal travel histories with real time and historical vehicle collocations. The KGB could have precisely monitored Known Intelligence Officer (KIO), and key employees with much reduced human resources.

Consider Victor Sheymov who directed KGB cipher communications worldwide, and became the highest-ranking intelligence official to defect. Victor's first objective for escape was contacting a KIO. He circumvented multi-level surveillance included agents posing as foreigners, permanent listening and optical devises in restaurants and hotels, and stationary surveillance by Seventh Directorate "traffic officers" or agents in covert stations with powerful optics.

Such elaborate, labor-intensive methods proved effective because the U.S.S.R. restricted foreign travel. Those from NATO countries could qualify for multiple surveillance teams, and planted vehicle homing devices. Restricted travel meant direction-monitoring towers provided real time vehicle locations. GPS monitoring allows achieving the same objectives without limiting travel.

Just because you are not paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. Is this government intrusion warranted? Victor escaped the Soviet Union, but where do we go?

Tower of Secrets by Victor Sheymov

24 posted on 06/25/2016 6:40:20 PM PDT by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

I put nothing past the crowd down on Assembly street nowadays.

If NC adopts something like this ever, SC won’t be far behind.


25 posted on 06/25/2016 6:42:55 PM PDT by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

I am 100% travel and 95 (thou it sucks), runs SC.


26 posted on 06/25/2016 6:43:18 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
They won't be able to tax me since I lost my car in a boating accident

27 posted on 06/25/2016 6:44:01 PM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

Since the EPA has been considered, and mostly passed a law that forbids aftermarket modification to cars, I’ll continue to drive an old car.

I would love to see, at least some Kabuchi theater, the state of PA and the EPA go at each other.

It won’t happen, I mean .... I’ll be left with the black eye but still.

OH, and it should be noted for those who aren’t familiar with it. Pennsylvania has the most draconian DMV laws in the nation. They DO NOT WANT YOU TO DRIVE A CAR.


28 posted on 06/25/2016 6:44:58 PM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

29 posted on 06/25/2016 6:45:22 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
They’ll tax both.

You are correct, I have never seen a tax removed.

30 posted on 06/25/2016 6:47:41 PM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

“They’ll tax both.”

Yup.


31 posted on 06/25/2016 6:48:32 PM PDT by ModelBreaker (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

Lets tax the politicians because we allow them to represent us


32 posted on 06/25/2016 6:49:17 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (without the 1st we have no second)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

Isn’t this already done on the NJ Turnpike. They have a toll booth at the beginning and depending on which exit/how far you go, you pay the printed fee. End to End is $13.85.


33 posted on 06/25/2016 7:02:39 PM PDT by MarineMom613 (RIP Sandra Sue, my fur baby 12/31/1999 ~ 7/2/2010 - See you on the other side!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
For all its flaws, a mileage-based revenue stream is much closer to a true "pay-as-you-go" system. A car that gets 40 mpg causes just as much congestion as one that gets 20 mpg, so there's really no reason why the driver of the 20-mpg car should effectively pay twice as much in taxes as the other one.

If there had never been such a thing as a fuel tax, this would probably not be nearly as controversial among conservatives as it is now.

34 posted on 06/25/2016 7:02:48 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Also: Will allow for post issuing of speeding tickets. Travel on I 95 will be time stamped thru I pass/ezpass. If average speed is greater than posted speed limit, presto a speeding ticket for something exorbitant will show up. They will collect by having reciprocity with other states to suspend license until fines paid.


35 posted on 06/25/2016 7:04:07 PM PDT by slapshot (Change target aquisition to Hillarita and all socialists, not fellow conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

They just want to be able to decide what you will do in all cases. They think they’re smart and we’re all numb.


36 posted on 06/25/2016 7:04:44 PM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kindred

This has been whispered for years. I’ve told friends it’s coming to all states within 5 years. They thought I was crazy. I hope they wake up now.


37 posted on 06/25/2016 7:06:37 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“For all its flaws, a mileage-based revenue stream is much closer to a true “pay-as-you-go” system. A car that gets 40 mpg causes just as much congestion as one that gets 20 mpg, so there’s really no reason why the driver of the 20-mpg car should effectively pay twice as much in taxes as the other one. “

Who says they won’t ‘adjust’ the road pricing due to gas mileage, greenhouse gasses, time of day, which particular road, income level, or Tea Party affiliation?

This opens a HUGE CAN OF WORMS that we would all be better, and freer, not having to deal with.


38 posted on 06/25/2016 7:28:11 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
I used to do all my own fuel taxes when I had a big rig years ago. You had to track how many miles you drove in each state, how much fuel you purchased in each state and do the math. However, you did not pay for miles accumulated while driving on the toll roads. The idea being, logically, that you were paying for the use of that road directly. Yet cars do-they pay the toll and pay tax on the fuel. Based on this, I see states keeping all existing taxes on fuel and taxing miles driven. They will make some excuse or the other....
39 posted on 06/25/2016 7:53:58 PM PDT by Aut Pax Aut Bellum (The Summer of 2016 is going to be interesting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001
they want no travel....all these peons traveling to all the exotic locations like Yellowstone or the Alamo....

its just control, restriction and control, and of course more dough...

if some states do it, all states will eventually do it...

statist never cease in their desire to have all the peons money...

you can best believe that there will special dispensations for the ferals and the govt employees...

40 posted on 06/25/2016 8:12:34 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson