Your hatred of women is blinding you.
Someone shot and killed the girls. It was either the mother or the father.
The woman had the gun in her hand, hence the belief that it was she who killed the girls.
And the father was just doing what there? You’re right that there’s not much information in the article, but anyone who is present in the commission of a crime and does nothing to stop it is complicit in the crime.
It’s legal precedent.
It’s got nothing to do with *blame the man* and I did not blame him. Again, your hatred of women is interfering with your ability to think clearly. YOU’RE making assumptions about what you thought I meant that I didn’t even allude to.
If and when the police find probable cause, which they might never do, then the man might be booked.
Just one hint, battered spouse syndrome is possible for both genders. It draws on the power of Satan himself.
Mail your law degree back to wherever you got it. There's no duty for an unarmed man to take on an armed felon. If you are a lawyer, you are grossly incompetent.
I can offer no solutions for your rabid feminism.
It happened at the father's home. He has every right to be there, and does not have to explain why, or what he was doing at the time.