Ha, Ha, Ha, I love it...let the ‘door kicker; screamer; hissy fit; childish; BRAT’ leave the White House NOW!!!
Hey, have you failed to notice Obama doesn’t follow the law and no one does a single thing to stop it ? This Supreme Court decision doesn’t mean jack !
OK, that’s good but what about the even GREATER problem of Obama letting in tens of thousands of Muslims which almost certainly are infiltrated with ISIS and IslamoCrazies?
What’s it going to take to stop that NOW???
Obama should have to Adopt all those unaccompanied Children
The decision means nothing to Obama. He has already said that he plans to ignore the law and not enforce them.
Presidents cannot make their own laws or change the ones Congress has passed, even if 4 Supreme Court Justices disagree and think he can.
He is still illegally legalizing illegal aliens under the first illegal amnesty called DACA. The first illegal amnesty for illegal aliens that he illegally implemented is still going forward illegally legalizing illegal aliens.
Because no one sued to stop him.
Only the SECOND illegal amnesty for illegal aliens has been stopped, for now, by the states suing to stop it.
Our putative opposition party not only did not sue to stop the first amnesty, they fully funded it.
Anyone else notice that Lyle Dennison reveals himself as rabid Democrat partisan on this issue?
“Second, a group of twenty-six states with Republican leaders had gained a historic new opportunity to use the courts as a way to wage policy combat with a Democratic president.”
Why wouldn’t this ruling apply to all presidents? Could it be that it is Democrat presidents who try to rule by dictat?
Judge Hagen has not been a happy camper
It applied both to the entire November 2014 policy as it applied to adult parents of children who had gained a right to remain in the country.
**************************************************
The SECOND amnesty, DAPA, 2014 was to piggyback on the first amnesty, DACA, 2012.
Legalize the “children”, up to age 30, and then legalize the adults who brought their children across international boundaries in violation of federal and international laws.
Zero is all wee wee’d up about not getting in his muslim fighters.
The whole point of the government lying to Judge Hanen about going forward with the program was to create the evidence they need to win the case at trial. It all revolves around whether the DAPA program is an exercise of prosecutorial discretion on a case by case basis or whether the program created a new class of lawfully present aliens. Prosecutorial discretion in removal cases is a matter committed to agency discretion under 8 U.S.C. 1852 and not reviewable by courts under Chevron USA v. Natural Resources Defense Council. The creation of a new class of lawfully present aliens is a matter exclusively committed to Congress under Article I Sec. 8 Naturalization Clause, and the Executive has no authority to do so.
In finding that the DAPA program was not an exercise of prosecutorial discretion, Judge Hanen looked at the similar DACA program and found Homeland Security never denied an applicant who met the minimum qualifications. Therefore, not discretion, but instead it was a new class. When the Judge barred the implementation of DAPA, the government did not have the opprtunity to deny any applicants and prove they were exercising discretion.
So the government went ahead with the DAPA program and the U. S. Attoneys lied about it. That's why the Judge has the ethics issues and orders in his court regarding the AUSAs. But the real reason they were going ahead with the program was so they could randomly deny a few qualified applicants and prove at trial that they exercised prosecutorial discretion.
We'll see if Judge Hanen lets them get away with it.
bookmark
sorry but a scotus ruling does not i repeat does not affect a presidential decree. this admin will carry on.