Posted on 06/22/2016 12:07:06 PM PDT by Hojczyk
Disingenuous. If it looks and quacks like a duck, it must be a duck. What does Gergan want, a confession?
Evidence not possible without grand jury or the 33,000 deleted emails.
Wow, what on earth could get that reaction?
Specifically, Gergan’s reaction in Alex Jones interview?
“book has been discredited”
That is the way the liberals are.
When something is brought up that is negative, but true, they will say, “That is old news.”
He feels safe in saying that the book has been discredited because he feels sure the average person will not take the time to research it and the lie will be reverberated, obligingly, throughout the media.
The book has been discredited because Gergen is the self appointed Credit Authority.
David Taqiyya Gergen
Washed up David Gergen needs to go back to PBS.
It is now considered ‘discredited’ because he said it was ‘discredited’, thus ‘discrediting’ it.
That is how the Left works. That is how the Clintons work.
Look for them to work a similar rationale into their talkingpoints:
‘That book was discredited on CNN.’
“What does Gergen think about the Clintons friend Don Lasater?”
I think you mean Dan Lasater:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB920423518737447500
Or how about Jeffrey Epstein:
http://www.mofopolitics.com/2014/04/22/flashback-bill-clinton-gives-high-school-girls-cocaine-in-exchange-for-sexual-favors/
That was David Broder. They do resemble each other.
-PJ
Why Rush referred to him as David “Rodham” Gergen.
Gergen has been embarrassing himself for years. Nothing new on that front.
David Gergen, the Hillary propagandist, needs a new name. How about Lord Haw-Haw 2.0.
BOR said basically the same thing about Clinton Chinese money in his opening statements tonight.
He used to be the green eggs and ham guy, which is why he disdains Ted Cruz.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.