Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN’s David Gergen Embarrasses Himself: Falsely Claims Clinton Cash ‘Discredited’
Breitbart ^ | June 22,2016 | Matthew Boyle

Posted on 06/22/2016 12:07:06 PM PDT by Hojczyk

“I was really surprised he leaned as heavily as he did upon the Schweizer book, Clinton Cash—that book has been basically discredited,” Gergen said. “Other news organizations have looked at it and said he has no evidence, he has no evidence that shows money given by donors to the Clinton Foundation then resulted in actions by the State Department that favored those donors.”

Gergen also claimed later on CNN that the speech was “slanderous” and again claimed that the book has been “widely discredited.”

Gergen’s claim couldn’t be further from the truth and proves he clearly has not read the following mainstream publications that have confirmed key details in Clinton Cash: The New York Times, The New Yorker, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, Reuters, CBS News, ABC News, and Politico.

As Breitbart News detailed in April, each of those publications has confirmed several key details of the Clinton Cash book. The Times confirmed that Clinton violated the Memorandum of Understanding she signed with the Obama administration that promised the disclosure of foreign donations.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bookreview; clintoncash; clintongate; gergen; hal; hchc; hillaryscandals; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 06/22/2016 12:07:06 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Gergen has been discredited.


2 posted on 06/22/2016 12:10:41 PM PDT by proust (Trump/Sessions 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

They just wanted to get the word “discredited” floating in headlines out there. The low-info voter will think no further.


3 posted on 06/22/2016 12:11:46 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

They just wanted to get the word “discredited” floating in headlines out there. The low-info voter will think no further.


Yep. Gergan has the talking point down. Someone from the Clinton campaign has been blowing sweet nothings in Gergens ear.


4 posted on 06/22/2016 12:13:43 PM PDT by lodi90 (Clear choice for Conservatives now: TRUMP or lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: proust

‘discredited’?

Gergen is paid to lie.

The only way he discredits himself is if he tells the truth.


5 posted on 06/22/2016 12:14:09 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Democrats say stuff.

They say the same stuff over and over and over again.
They say the stuff until everyone believes the stuff.

This time it's different. Trump won't let them get away with it.

6 posted on 06/22/2016 12:15:53 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The official language of the United States should be Arabic. It's clear that our government is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Gergen says anything for the candidate he works for.

Political Hack = Gergen


7 posted on 06/22/2016 12:16:35 PM PDT by Nachum (ISIS is alive... and Chris Stevens is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

Once again the discredited Gergen tries to save the Clinton’s bacon—this has been his M.O. for decades now. He is a name-only republican who the dems love to trot out as a surrogate for their failed and deceitful policies.


8 posted on 06/22/2016 12:16:39 PM PDT by The Continental Op
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Anyone have David’s email or bosses email?


9 posted on 06/22/2016 12:18:24 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Lyin’ Dave


10 posted on 06/22/2016 12:20:29 PM PDT by Lexington Green (Why isn't Hillary in jail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Yep. Exact word used by CBS against Juanita Broderick. Definitely Clinton campaign directed them to use that term.


11 posted on 06/22/2016 12:21:07 PM PDT by Williams (If Trump is not the nominee ... The party's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: proust

“Gergen has been discredited.”

His lobotomy was done by an Affirmative Action Degreed Kenyan I was told.......


12 posted on 06/22/2016 12:21:11 PM PDT by litehaus (A memory toooo long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Continental Op

If I had Trump’s investigators, I would trace payoff’s to Gergen from the DNC or Clinton. You know that he lied, we know he knows the writer is truthful, so he has to be paid to lie.

It would be nice to prove he is a paid liar, corrupt just like Hillary.

Trump nail him and you have your poster boy who says he is a Republican.

I feel the same way about Colon Bowel, and he stooge underling Armitage who endorsed Cankles.

#NeverCrookedHillary


13 posted on 06/22/2016 12:22:16 PM PDT by Zenjitsuman (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

That’s all the Clinton campaign has, deny, deny, deny. Her entire campaign is based solely on lies, from her dodging sniper fire to how wonderful she is for women and children. Throw in some smoke and mirrors, and there you have her entire campaign in a nutshell, which, btw, is where it belongs.


14 posted on 06/22/2016 12:22:23 PM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

That’s the standard ‘rat word for anything that they don’t like. For example, the “highly edited, discredited Planned Parenthood videos,” that were anything but.


15 posted on 06/22/2016 12:23:06 PM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust
-- Gergen has been discredited. --

Long ago. He's earned his place at the CNN table as "trustworthy," using the media definition of that term.

16 posted on 06/22/2016 12:23:46 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Rush was calling him “David Rodham Gergen” twenty years ago.

Some people never change.


17 posted on 06/22/2016 12:25:27 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If the Orlando terrorist doesnÂ’t represent all Muslims, why does he represent all gun-owners?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

My favorite clip of Gergen losing his mind when asked about Bohemian Grove and the secret rituals he attended.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHFoUZEjuNM


18 posted on 06/22/2016 12:25:42 PM PDT by proust (Trump/Sessions 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I thought he was dead. Honesty.


19 posted on 06/22/2016 12:26:47 PM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Bwahahahaha! The Benghazi B*tch’s monetary fortune has been well documented and verified. Pay to play is the Clinton family motto.


20 posted on 06/22/2016 12:27:40 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (<---has now left CA for NV, where God/guns have not been outlawed! Prayers for Trump and family)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson