Skip to comments.
The Supreme Court Just Created a Full-Blown Police State
armstrongeconomics.com ^
| Jun 21, 2016
| Martin Armstrong
Posted on 06/22/2016 11:37:57 AM PDT by TangoLimaSierra
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Anybody been following this? Does not sound good.
To: TangoLimaSierra
Two states to so far avoid: Utah and Oklahoma.
2
posted on
06/22/2016 11:39:33 AM PDT
by
SkyDancer
("They Say That Nobody's Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
To: TangoLimaSierra
Miranda is dead..........................
3
posted on
06/22/2016 11:39:34 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Make America AMERICA again!.........................)
To: SkyDancer
Two states to so far avoid: Any East of the Mississippi and any West of the Mississippi..................
4
posted on
06/22/2016 11:41:22 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Make America AMERICA again!.........................)
To: TangoLimaSierra
The State has not been your servant for decades. You are their tax slave, at best.
5
posted on
06/22/2016 11:42:58 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....eI aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
To: TangoLimaSierra
The new rule only applies to those who are under probation, out on bail, etc. No need for reasonable suspicion. That's typical, FWIW, as part of judge-imposed conditions when anybody appears before the bench, until the case is settled. What's different here is that the target was out and about, minding his own business.
If the cops pinch a person who is not on probation or otherwise personally in view of the law, the usual (weak) fourth amendment applies. If the government thinks the search was unreasonable (which amounts to absence of any reason to have suspicion), then it won't use the evidence against you.
6
posted on
06/22/2016 11:43:02 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: TangoLimaSierra; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...
7
posted on
06/22/2016 11:43:20 AM PDT
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Cuckservative: a "conservative" willing to raise another country's ideology in his own country)
To: TangoLimaSierra
8
posted on
06/22/2016 11:43:36 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: TangoLimaSierra
I tell you people and I keep telling you people, it’s in the water...you drink it and you become totally insane instantly...
I’m sitting here shaking my head...Welcome to Utah, the United Police State of America...
9
posted on
06/22/2016 11:44:07 AM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
To: Red Badger
Best to fly below the RADAR, and go Galt.
10
posted on
06/22/2016 11:44:33 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....eI aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
To: TangoLimaSierra
The SCOTUS doesn’t “rule” it “opines”
11
posted on
06/22/2016 11:44:40 AM PDT
by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: TangoLimaSierra
This is a good thing. We now can send armies of law enforcement into Chicago and stop the wanton slaughter of black people by the thousands including a 3 year old child last week end. Let’s mount up!!
12
posted on
06/22/2016 11:44:51 AM PDT
by
WENDLE
(Ban Wahhabis . Not guns!! Profile them!!)
To: TangoLimaSierra
This is a duplicate thread on this topic I posted yesterday.
Although this SCOTUS ruling is yet additional erosion of our 4th and 5th Ammendments, there is more to it than Armstrong’s blogging indicates.
See related legal analysis
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3442064/posts
At any rate, we know where is is all leading to...
RE: “Anybody been following this? Does not sound good.”
13
posted on
06/22/2016 11:45:02 AM PDT
by
MarchonDC09122009
(When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
To: HarleyLady27
U may not be wacko, as it turns out......
14
posted on
06/22/2016 11:45:43 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....eI aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
To: TangoLimaSierra
Total nonsense. If you don’t have a warrant for your arrest outstanding then this ruling wouldn’t effect you at all.
To: TangoLimaSierra
‘cept if your Mexican............Sheriff Joe Arpio
16
posted on
06/22/2016 11:45:45 AM PDT
by
notaliberal
(St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle,)
To: TangoLimaSierra; BuckeyeTexan
Anybody been following this? The thread on the Court's decision is here. FWIW, the majority opinion was by Thomas and the dissent by Sotomayor.
To: Cboldt
Well this sure sounds like something different than what that blazing jeremiad makes it out to be.
We should try not to be played.
18
posted on
06/22/2016 11:47:40 AM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: TangoLimaSierra
The Supreme Court Just Created a Full-Blown Police State
...
Too much drama.
The ruling was consistent with others. If you don’t have an arrest warrant this ruling won’t affect you. And even if you do the probability is this ruling won’t affect you either.
19
posted on
06/22/2016 11:48:03 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Make America Great Again!)
To: WENDLE
Nobody’s bothering to even understand this. They are just knee jerking and chesty thumping.
20
posted on
06/22/2016 11:48:25 AM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson