Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Read This Before The Government Uses the Orlando Shooting to Start Another War
Anti Media ^ | 17 June 2016 | Claire Bernish

Posted on 06/21/2016 12:51:52 PM PDT by Lorianne

Late Thursday evening, the Wall Street Journal reported, 51 State Department officials signed a statement condemning U.S. policy in Syria in which they repeatedly call for “targeted military strikes against the Damascus government and urging regime change as the only way to defeat Islamic State.”

“In other words,” as Zero Hedge summarized, “over 50 top ‘diplomats’ are urging to eliminate [Syrian Pres. Bashar al] Assad in order to ‘defeat ISIS’, the same ISIS which top US ‘diplomats’ had unleashed previously in order to … eliminate Assad.”

This gordian knot created by United States foreign policy — and intensified by that same policy — means not only could war with Syria be on the horizon, but if that happens, the U.S. could be facing a far more serious threat.

While discontented officials used what’s known as the “Dissent Channel” — “an official forum that allows employees to express opposing views,” State Department spokesman John Kirby explained in the WSJ — Saudi government officials employed more direct means to press their interests with the U.S. in Syria.

excerpted


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Russia; Syria; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; agitprop; alexjones; antimedia; astroturf; banzerohedge; clairebernish; colinlokey; danielivandjiiski; election2016; isis; newyork; obamasyria; orlandoterrorattack; paidrussiantrolls; prisonplanet; putingaveiranthebomb; putinsbuttboys; putinsbuttgirl; putinsbuttgirls; receptayyiperdogan; russia; russianstooge; russianstooges; statedeptdiplomats; syria; syriawar; timbackshall; trump; turkey; tylerdurden; tylerdurdenmyass; vladtheimploder; zerohedge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Lorianne

The goal of defeating ISIS is just some pablum that is being fed to the populace, in order to get support for using the US military in Syria. Obviously, if anyone looks at this in a logical way, the major objective of these people is to remove Assad, not to fight ISIS.

ISIS, to these people, is not the enemy. The belief is you can make deals with them, use them for more strategic objectives. Strategically, the enemy is RUSSIA, not ISIS.


21 posted on 06/21/2016 1:42:28 PM PDT by RAldrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

5. Or it’s the fault of the NRA.


22 posted on 06/21/2016 1:47:24 PM PDT by Tucker39 (Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in Faith, and politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tailback

If I were a carrier admiral in the area (or someone of similar responsibility) I would already have been very carefully looking at ways to get my own ‘hot line’ to the Red forces. So if 4M orders me to blow up ‘insurgents’ that look suspiciously Russian or ‘enforce a no fly zone’ with MiG’s buzzing around my ears, I can warn them and avoid giving Ivan a perfectly legitimate reason to go full-bore on my nation.


23 posted on 06/21/2016 1:48:29 PM PDT by Laser_Ray (Another nifty idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

Obama is ISIS, he wants to win.


24 posted on 06/21/2016 1:49:18 PM PDT by MrBambaLaMamba ( Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Can’t we just arm obozo and Hillary, point them in the direction of Syria and tell them to take care of the mess they created? Heck - we could even drop them out of an airplane over the battlefield. Anything - just get them out of our hair! And since when do State Department employees get to be for or against policies of the U. S.? Are they not just bureaucrats without any cabinet standing?

On second thought, send Kirby with obozo and Hillary!


25 posted on 06/21/2016 2:09:59 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailback

bump


26 posted on 06/21/2016 2:17:02 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Laser_Ray

RE: #23

Unfortunately, the 4M administration has seeded the pentagon with CAIR and muslim brotherhood affiliated people. I’m sure on a ship as important as a aircraft carrier there are planted “political officers” keeping an eye on the command leadership.

Why else would so many senior military officers get relieved of duty under the 4M presidency?


27 posted on 06/21/2016 3:03:19 PM PDT by Tailback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

“....are urging to eliminate [Syrian Pres. Bashar al] Assad in order to ‘defeat ISIS’...”

Let me get this straight - 51 US diplomats want to kill Assad who is being protected by Russia. Now,
1. How will that improved the Obama-caused turmoil in the Middle-east?
2. What advantage will the US gain?
3. Who will fill the void?
4. What will be the Russian response be?
5. What business does the US have in interfering with those people.
6, Is Obama trying to stir the pot to leave the Mideast as a worse nightmare for the next administration than it is already.


28 posted on 06/21/2016 6:20:13 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute
I didn’t get this and still don’t. How is it attacking Assad is going to defeat ISIS?

Quite the contrary.

Assad is fighting the terrorists.

Deposing him will give ISIS a clear path to dominating Syria.

Wherever in the mid-east the US Government tries, or claims to be trying, to spread democracy the country ends up worse off.

Libya, Egypt, Iraq, now Syria.

If Assad falls and ISIS takes over Syria Barack Obama will be happy.


29 posted on 06/21/2016 6:57:40 PM PDT by Iron Munro (If liberals were in charge of the oceans, in 5 years the water would be gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
I trust Russia more than the Clinton/Obama regime to do the right thing in Syria.

I also trust the drinking water in Mexico more than I trust the Clinton/Obama regime.

30 posted on 06/21/2016 9:09:53 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute
I didn’t get this and still don’t. How is it attacking Assad is going to defeat ISIS?

Short answer, there's nothing wrong with your logic circuits.

Attacking Assad will do absolutely *nothing* to defeat ISIS, and in fact, will likely make them stronger...

the infowarrior

31 posted on 06/21/2016 11:31:19 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson