[usafa92]

Confirm from Morning Consult that Hillary got a bump last week and Trump ticked down due to negative coverage and non-stop assault by the media. However, Hillary cannot break 42 (again) and the numbers of undecideds are huge. Potential concern from this little gadfly Gary Johnson, who at the moment is a parking place for people who are not comfortable with Trump. This poll was taken June 8-9, right after the last primaries but before Orlando. Let's see what this says next week.

[Buckeye McFrog]

Not historic because she didn’t earn it.

The Democrats OWED her bigtime for not walking away and tanking her husband’s Presidency when Drudge broke the Monica story nearly twenty years ago.

This nomination was handed to her because her party had no choice.

[econjack]

I see it as a mistake, especially since she should be in jail by now.

[Talisker]

“This is a big deal. A stop-everything-you’re-doing-to-think-about-the-history-we-just-made big deal,” said Stephanie Schriock.

No it isn't, Stephanie. 60% of women disagree with you.

[MaxistheBest]

The GOP is trying to hand Hillary the win...traitors all of them.

[HarleyLady27]

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/06/corrected_national_polling_data_shows_trump_in_the_lead.html

[LS]

1) Registered, not likely
2) MOE of 2
3) Don’t know D/R split, so a
at worst a tie

[AngelesCrestHighway]

It would be historic for sure! HISTORIC MISTAKE!

[Iron Munro]

The fact that The Beast’s campaign style is histrionic doesn’t make her nomination historic.

[Jack Hammer]

An act of historic stupidity, perhaps.

[Uversabound]

I am embarrased that this is what women have turned into.

[LostPassword]

Most voters are clueless. One of the biggest crime families in history has a good chance to take control of the most powerful country in history. I’d call that historic.

[Jim Noble]

The whole premise of the question is intended to push the weak-minded in Hillary’s direction.

“Historic? Like, wow! I never thought of it like that!”

[Vision Thing]

Poor hillarhoids. This year is her only chance. But it comes after another historic event of the first black-looking person becoming president.

This previous historic event overshadows her own historic event.

If she could’ve only waited until 2020 to run, perhaps her historic achievement would’ve been a novelty. Right now, it’s not.

[funfan]

What is so historic about a LIAR running for office?

[TexasFreeper2009]

Make no mistake, no one would be doing better than Trump is.

Either Trump wins or there is no hope left for this country.

[faithhopecharity]

her nomination will be historic!

1. only nominee known to be bought, soldout to, and paid for by foreign enemy Moslem dictatorships
2. only noninee known to be under active FBI investigation for treason=related federal crimes
3. only nominee known to have driven her so-called ‘husband’ to play Cigar with very young ladies in the Oral Office
4. only nominee known to consort (apparently almost 24/7) with a lady who is a known member of an extremely anti-American enemy Muslim Brotherhood family
5. .....

[ksm1]

I don’t see what’s historic either, Hillary is another masculine candidate, nothing new.

[upchuck]

Rather than view Killary’s nomination as historic, I view it as a shame.

[Magnum44]

Has there been a woman or person nominated who was under criminal investigation before? That would be historic, wouldn’t it?