Bezos is using the Amazon Email lists to send out daily Anti-Trump hate and propaganda as “The Top Stories of the Day from the Washington Post”.
Trump SHOULD cut them out.
Bother me?....not in the least,as a matter if fact, it’s about time
Just say NO to WaPo political propaganda!
Freedom of the Press does not give the press the right to unfettered access to the people they wish to criticize. These people are complete morons who lack common sense and simple reasoning abilities.
Hey, WAPO, in a fight between Trump and the press, who do you think most people are going to side with?
Heck no, it’s doesn’t bother me in the least, given the Post’s penchant for lying to its readers.
My fellow conservatives may have qualms about me marrying my boyfriend, but at least I know they won't shoot up my wedding... #gaysfortrump
TMZ & National Enquirer should only be allowed.
They lead the industry with 20% accuracy and also running at a profit.
No bother at all. That sound you hear is me clapping in approval.
serves the media right. They need to learn to report thing that happen, not make things happen. That’s their only “obligation,” as well as fighting subversive ideas like fascism, communism, and Islam.
“Donald Trump just barred Washington Post reporters from campaign events.”
Hooray!
“That should bother you.”
Only if I thought they were a legitimate newspaper.
doesn’t bother me a bit. F Amazon
I’m sure the Washington Post “reporters” will be able to fabricate anti-Trump propaganda without attending campaign events.
So sayeth the Washington Post.
The Washington Post has a team of 24 reporters whose job it is to take down Trump. Trump said in one of his speeches at one of his rallies that they are going to put all the negative stuff they can find into a book!
How many reporters are assigned to Hillary Clinton? Why isn’t the politics’ section littered with negative articles about Hillary? Why are his statements spun and taken out of context when I don’t see that with her? I will give them that they occasionally do write a fair article on Trump and occasionally do write a negative on Hillary, but that is the exception rather than the rule over there. They churn out negative articles on Trump at an alarming rate.
WaPo made this bed on purpose. 20 reporters were assigned to do what is effectively opposition research on Trump. Meanwhile, Hillary would require 20 researchers just to properly index her scandals, but none appear to be assigned to that task at all.
If WaPo wants to be seen as anything other than an extension of the Clinton campaign, a radical change in behavior is in order.
Go Donald!
From the article: It’s how things work. It’s how things have always worked. The media’s job isn’t to simply write down whatever the candidate says and regurgitate it. The candidate’s job isn’t to kowtow to the media or do and say things the way he or she thinks the media wants to hear.
- - - - -
After eight years of stenography for Obama, they are discovering what their job should be? Give me a break!
You don’t have the right to print lies about me and have it come with the expectation of unfettered access to me.
If you’re not going to tell the truth and do your job, well that burdens you more than it hurts me.
When all is said and done, who you do think the American people hate more? Game, set and match.
The Washington Post’s whining over the cancellation of their press credentials re the Trump campaign is their problem.
1. Yes, it bothers me he has waited this long.
2. In another sense, what are you crybabies upset about? You can watch the speeches on the internets like most of us.
3. Most of your propaganda is already written--you just fill in different quotes, names, and times. Don't pretend you don't have a bias against Donald Trump. You do. So you have reaped what you sowed.