Posted on 06/13/2016 5:26:33 PM PDT by detective
Donald Trump’s speech on national security, which he delivered the day after the terrorist attack in Orlando, Florida, will change the dynamic of this election.
The speech was specific, detailed, and on the money. Trump showed how strategic securing the border is, how important stopping immigration from terror zones like Syria is, and how deadly political correctness has become. Political correctness – which transforms the Islamic world, which has a lot to answer for, from aggressors into innocent victims – functions as a shield for Islamic terrorists, and handcuffs law-abiding citizens prompting them not to report suspicious activities by Muslims for fear of being called racist.
Trump was especially courageous (and politically incorrect) in pointing out that the Muslim communities in which the terrorists operate know what is going on but don’t say anything. What a contrast with Hillary’s speech today, which focused on reinforcing political correctness – attacking so-called assault rifles, as though guns and not fanatics were the problem, and emphasizing the importance of not alienating Muslims by acknowledging that a large and growing segment of the Islamic world is at war with us. What contempt for Muslims who are also victims of Islamic terror!
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
That should be made into a poster and stuck in every gay night club in America.
Trump better watch his back or a fanatic might try to assassinate him with a bomb or drone or Kamikaze airplane attack. I would not put it past Hillary or Obama.
Bookmark
Bookmark
Yes it was...
Yes, one must remind oneself, musn't one? We're in a whirlwind here.
I am surprised D. Horowitz, a big liberal, praised Trump. btw, I thought Trump’s speech was great.>>>> he was a communist like his parents, but is and has been for along time conservative since his friend van Patton, i believe, was murdered by the friends of obama. “Radical Son” is a great read and many others.
Sorry, I was thinking of another Horowitz.>>> I think there is a Daniel out there.
I noticed that he actually had a patina of anger and outrage over what the perp did while neither Obama or Hillary seemed to be the least bit outraged..
The panel on Special Report tonight (of which Krauthamer was a part) was just as bad! They kept dwelling on the story about Trump banning the Washington Post from his rallies today. I don't blame him because the stories they write about Trump are hit pieces. The elites despise any Republican who stands up to their allies in the media. It would be interesting to see their reaction if the press actually was even handed rather than being the chief cheerleader of the left. That liberal guy (whose name escapes me) that has been covering the Clintons since Arkansas (and LOVES Hillary) was on, as well as Stephen Hayes, who has totally lost all objectivity when it comes to DJT.
Wow.
I suspect that after 7.5 years of Obama, what the FBI needs more than budget is the removal of PC and even MB leadership.
Yes, he is one of the good guys.
Frank Robinson? Seriously? What has it been, 40 years since HE hit one?
I’d rather use this year’s biggest threat at the plate, Mark Trumbo. He’s already hit 20, projected to hit 52. Now THAT’S what I’m talkin’ ‘bout! GO TRUMP GO!!!
Bin Laden’s objective was whatever the CIA’s objective was.
So many have tried to criticize his lack of Christian faith. The Word says when Satan lies he speaks his native tongue. So where was Bush's Christianity when he said "religion of peace".
Sorry typo: Nice synopsis
.
Obama and Hillary were not outraged; they were gleeful at the presentation of what they intend to misuse to create more unconstitutional excursions into tyranny.
Thanks for the picture of Hillary she posted only a few days before the massacre in Orlando.
It's telling...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.