Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton call for ban on AR-15s
CNN ^ | 06/13/20`6 | MNnice

Posted on 06/13/2016 11:01:09 AM PDT by MNnice

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: MNnice

If background checks can not touch wife beating Muslim fundamentalists who visit Afghanistan for weapons training and have been investigated by the FBI two times, then who exactly are the background checks aimed at...??

sounds like de facto gun registration.

the government should be subsidizing AR-15 purchases for all law-abiding Americans.


21 posted on 06/13/2016 11:09:57 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNnice

A ban on muslims would be better.


22 posted on 06/13/2016 11:10:00 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCarea51

I bought 3 SKS’s for $129 each back in 1997.


23 posted on 06/13/2016 11:10:18 AM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

She doesn’t know what an “assault rifle” is....

If it “looks like” a military weapon, it’s automatically an “assault rifle”.....


24 posted on 06/13/2016 11:10:36 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MNnice

3.3 million muslims in the U.S...
300 million firearms in private hands...

Orlando shows that you’re 10 times as likely to be killed by a muslim, yet their argument is to ban the guns? And Trump is a racist for suggesting we ban the import of muslim terrorists?

Hmm....


25 posted on 06/13/2016 11:10:44 AM PDT by Hugh the Scot ( Total War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

She would dearly love to ban ALL firearms in civilian hands. Even black powder firearms.


26 posted on 06/13/2016 11:10:48 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is always just one or a thousand or a million more murders away from utopia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MNnice
All guns CAN kill d the AR a machine gun.

It's the KILLER we need to stop.

The FBI interviewed the guy how many times?

We interviewed the Boston Bombers how many times?

Our interviewers have shi**y instincts!

And Ft Hood...and Ca...

None of these should have happened. The same with the Movie theater, the politician, the DC bldg...

All happened either because of PC....or because people were left defenseless.

27 posted on 06/13/2016 11:11:13 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNnice

If Trump can stay out of his own way, this could be the key to defeating Hillary.


28 posted on 06/13/2016 11:12:42 AM PDT by G Larry (Avoiding the Truth-Hillary's only expertise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCarea51
154 dollars is what the SKS 7.62x39 was selling for then.

Back in the early 1990s for $100 you could walk out of a gun show, in Maryland no less, with a new in grease Chicom SKS and 1000 rds of Norinco steel core 7.62x39 ...

29 posted on 06/13/2016 11:12:58 AM PDT by NorthMountain (A plague o' both your houses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MNnice
She's an ass.

30 posted on 06/13/2016 11:13:00 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNnice

How does she plan to stop gun smuggling for terrorists?

As usual clueless. We need to submit and die as our masters tell us, it’s all for the public good.


31 posted on 06/13/2016 11:13:20 AM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

You can take a Ruger 10-22 and with some cosmetic add-ons, make it look like the most deadly “assault rifle” known to man...


32 posted on 06/13/2016 11:13:35 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

“If I could have banned them all - ‘Mr. and Mrs. America turn in your guns’ - I would have!”
- Diane Feinstein


33 posted on 06/13/2016 11:13:51 AM PDT by VRWCarea51 (The Original 1998 Version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MNnice

She wouldn’t know an AR-15 if it bit her in her large a$$.


34 posted on 06/13/2016 11:13:53 AM PDT by anoldafvet (they're not immigrants, they're criminal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNnice
This is the second major speech delivered by Hillary Clinton in recent days concerning foreign policy and terrorism. First, an observation concerning only the tone and manner of delivery of the speeches.

Shrill Hillary has learned how to modulate her voice and how to work effectively with teleprompters. She was very effective and has gone far to dispel the image of herself as a termagent whose presence in our living room for four or eight years is more than offputting. She was composed, her voice was modulated, her delivery was nearly flawless. Reading from a Teleprompter, it is not surprising that she made no gaffes.

If Hillary is able to continue in this mode she will go a long way toward improving her image and she will present a greater challenge to us.

When we analyze the content of the speech, we must understand that we live in a bubble and there is nothing she could say that would persuade us to vote for her. But we are not her audience, she seeks to energize the base and to capture independents. Considering the tone and content of the speech she is advanced those objectives.

For the first time she has referred to terrorists as Islamicists, no doubt to defray criticism from Donald Trump, and her calls for arms controls while unpalatable to us, are not so over the top as to turn off those who might be persuadable on the issue.

She put forth a reasonable proposals to combat these lone wolf attacks demonstrating to those who don't know better, that is, those who are ignorant of her character and biography, that she is competent.

Donald Trump is up in a few minutes and we will see if he can win the battle of the teleprompters.


35 posted on 06/13/2016 11:14:08 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNnice

Yo Bubba, you did have a 10 year AW ban that was so full of holes, you could drive the Queen Mary thru it. It had no affect wile in place and nothing changed when it was sunset’d.


36 posted on 06/13/2016 11:14:17 AM PDT by umgud (ban muslims, not guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNnice

Anti-gunners spilled their guts about HOW they would go about banning guns back in 1976. Since that time they have added rifles to their “to be banned” list.

Nelson T. ‘Pete’ Shields
Founder of Handgun Control, Inc.

“I’m convinced that we have to have federal legislation to build on. We’re going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily — given the political realities — going to be very modest.

Of course, it’s true that politicians will then go home and say, ‘This is a great law. The problem is solved.’ And it’s also true that such statements will tend to defuse the gun-control issue for a time.

So then we’ll have to strengthen that law, and then again to strengthen that law, and maybe again and again. Right now, though, we’d be satisfied not with half a loaf but with a slice. Our ultimate goal — total control of handguns in the United States — is going to take time.

My estimate is from seven to ten years. The problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns sold in this country. The second problem is to get them all registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition — except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors — totally illegal.”

-Pete Shields, Chairman and founder, Handgun Control Inc., “A Reporter At Large: Handguns,” The New Yorker, July 26, 1976, 57-58

“Yes, I’m for an outright ban [on handguns].”

-Pete Shields, Chairman emeritus, Handgun Control, Inc., 60 Minutes interview

HCI, around 1984, came out in favor of a ban on semi-auto rifles and shotguns.


37 posted on 06/13/2016 11:14:23 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNnice

Stupid Clinton’s why I can’t get a cheap FAL kit these days. Too bad I wasn’t old enough in the 90s...


38 posted on 06/13/2016 11:14:52 AM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
"She would dearly love to ban ALL firearms in civilian hands."

That's because the muslims would like to see firearms removed from American civilian hands. He position on guns is the return the muslims are getting for those quarter million dollar speaking fees.

39 posted on 06/13/2016 11:14:59 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MNnice

Don't worry, the media will give a well informed analysis.

40 posted on 06/13/2016 11:15:10 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson