Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin Has Imperial (Not Soviet) Aspirations
The Daily Signal ^ | 6/13/2016 | Luke Coffey

Posted on 06/13/2016 8:14:47 AM PDT by milton23

Whoever wins the race to the White House is going to have to deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin from day one. Hopefully, the next U.S. president will learn from the mistakes of the past.

One of the biggest foreign policy follies of the Obama administration was the so-called Russian “reset”.

In March 2009 Hillary Clinton and her Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov symbolically, if not awkwardly, pressed a “reset” button—to demonstrate a fresh start to U.S.-Russian relations.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailysign.al ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Russia; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; election2016; energy; europeanunion; imperial; methane; nato; newyork; opec; petroleum; putin; putingaveiranthebomb; russia; trump; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 06/13/2016 8:14:47 AM PDT by milton23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: milton23

I can agree with the title and the opening statement. Putin is a Russian Imperialist and Hillary’s Reset button was a laughable disaster that showed the abject juvenility of the Obama administration.

Still, Russian Imperialism is nothing to be scoffed at. It is as dangerous as Soviet Imperialism. Same $h1t different day.


2 posted on 06/13/2016 8:18:05 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milton23

Didn’t she get the translation wrong also.


3 posted on 06/13/2016 8:19:43 AM PDT by McGruff (How about investigating the donations to the Clinton Foundation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milton23

I have the feeling that if Trump were elected, he’d meet with Putin and the two of them would very quickly iron out our differences. And then they would go have a nice state dinner together, and trade some nasty barbs with each other for a good laugh.

On the other hand, if Hillary Clinton is President, Putin will own her like a pet dog, but she’s the type of irrational pet dog that still craps the carpet and needs a beating with the rolled up newspaper. He’s already got copies of all her e-mails. He’s already bought our uranium from her, and God knows what else. On the other hand, he knows he can’t trust her, she’s unstable, corrupt and unreliable.

Hard to say who he would prefer; someone he rents until the next highest bidder comes along, or someone he can rationally deal with.


4 posted on 06/13/2016 8:20:29 AM PDT by henkster (Don't listen to what people say, watch what they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

5 posted on 06/13/2016 8:32:49 AM PDT by Red Badger (Make America AMERICA again!.........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

I see opposite. The great dangers of the world for the are Islam and the infilitration into our government of same, and the corruption/leftists in the US government.

Russia? What is it going to do to CONUS? The US needs to stop trying to control the freaking world.

The US is on the ropes due to the corruption and tyranny of our own government, massive immigration both legal and illegal, mozlem invasion, and all the leftistpuke agendas being forced on everyone, too numerous to list.

Russia? Big Freaking Deal unless you think that the US should control Eastern Europe. I do not.


6 posted on 06/13/2016 8:40:46 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. FrankliIn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: milton23

Keep in mind that US relations with Imperial Russia were cordial, they even sold us Alaska.


7 posted on 06/13/2016 8:42:08 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milton23

I have no doubt that Putin would lie, cheat, and steal to help Russia.

On the other hand, I have no doubt that Putin would never lie, cheat, or steal to HURT Russia.

Putin is an example of what a leader who puts his country first, before every other county, looks like.

Compare that to Hillary Clinton, who puts the needs of those who pay her money first, even before the needs of America.


8 posted on 06/13/2016 8:45:58 AM PDT by Brookhaven (Hillary Clinton stood next to the coffin of an American soldier and lied to his parents' face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I said it was dangerous. I didn’t say we needed a new cold war to oppose it. However, we do have obligations and treaties to uphold or our word means squat. Like it does under Obama, frankly.

Whether we should have made those obligations to begin with is another argument I am willing to hear.

Now, will President Trump be able to make accommodations with President Putin? Yes, I really do believe so. The world will be a less dangerous place because of it.


9 posted on 06/13/2016 8:49:38 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: henkster
On the other hand, he knows he can’t trust her, she’s unstable, corrupt and unreliable.
Hard to say who he would prefer...

****

All good points, and I am nothing but a quick drive-by Kremlin watcher.

However, given his career from KGB agent to quite effectively out-dealing top Russian business leaders, I would wager that dealing with this unstable, corrupt and unreliable individual would play to his strong suit. He is no doubt very skilled in reading and manipulating trapped, unsure, panicky and not very clever individuals.

Aside from her ability to shriek, throw ashtrays and intimidate those with whom she surrounds herself (even to the extent that they destroy evidence of criminal acts), she is an amateur.

10 posted on 06/13/2016 8:51:13 AM PDT by frog in a pot (Cesar Chavez: "La Raza is a very dangerous concept. I speak very strongly against it...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator; milton23; Alas Babylon!
Keep in mind that US relations with Imperial Russia were cordial, they even sold us Alaska.

I heard they were on our side in WWI, WWII, and after 9-11, too.

11 posted on 06/13/2016 8:51:20 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

At least they didn’t get James Taylor to sing.


12 posted on 06/13/2016 8:55:21 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I Love Bull Markets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

I think Putin would respect Trump because he knows Trump will not fold like a cheap suit. I can see both of them negotiating in English (Putin’s English is quite good) and very animated as well (the security details will be thinking “are they gonna kill each other”), yet the two will get along quite well. I have had bosses that were terrors, but respected those who would stand their ground.


13 posted on 06/13/2016 8:56:54 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Still, Russian Imperialism is nothing to be scoffed at. It is as dangerous as Soviet Imperialism

No, it isn't.

Europe of the four empires was a more or less stable place. For little people, it was paradise compared to what followed 1918.

The Soviet Union had universalist ambitions. Right up until Chernenko, they had active subversion programs in every Western nation and global ambitions for communism.

If Russia controls its near abroad, they would do no more than WE should be doing with Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean.

A Habsburg on the throne in Vienna and a Romanov on the throne in St. Petersburg would make the world a better place.

14 posted on 06/13/2016 9:01:22 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Cruz never could have outfought Trump.But I didn't know until this day that it was Romney all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: milton23

It is true that Mr. Putin does wish to see a resurgence of ‘old Russia’, now tempered with the disaster years of Communism.

The old Czar’s military in Syria, echoed today, reminds me of another old Czar’s military history ... when a European commander made the first blunder of invading ‘Ol’ Russia’.


15 posted on 06/13/2016 9:03:14 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

+1


16 posted on 06/13/2016 9:10:04 AM PDT by Pelham (Islam vs the Free World in a death match)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Same $h1t different day.

Yup. The Tsars executed and deported hundreds of thousands from subject territories long before the Soviet Union.

Russia was and remains something like Mordor on the steppes.

17 posted on 06/13/2016 9:10:50 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
You left out a Kaiser on the throne in Berlin.

Which, given Germany's propensity to wander off on it's own Sonderweg as it is now doing wouldn't be a bad thing.

However, you are forgetting that Russia's frustrated ambition was the biggest single cause of the First World War.

Sort of like now.

18 posted on 06/13/2016 9:15:00 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: henkster

Putin wants to be Czar-—I agree—When Trump wins one of his first meetings will be with Putin and they were go behind locked doors and cut up the world into zones of influence. I think we will have a better relationship and be able to influence Russian Ambitions and work with Russia to end Isis and pressure North Korea into joining the nations of the world. Putin will see Trump as an ally, not an enemy (or fool).


19 posted on 06/13/2016 9:41:42 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

I agree. Putin in all KGB and is trying to resurrect the Empire. And none of what he does will be for the benefit of the West.


20 posted on 06/13/2016 10:14:35 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson