Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Landmark California bill would allow prosecution of climate-change skeptics
The Washington Times ^ | June 2, 2016 | Valerie Richardson

Posted on 06/02/2016 10:22:57 AM PDT by jazusamo

A landmark California bill gaining steam would make it illegal to engage in climate-change dissent, clearing the way for lawsuits against fossil-fuel companies, think-tanks and others that have “deceived or misled the public on the risks of climate change.”

The first-of-its-kind legislation — Senate Bill 1161, or the California Climate Science Truth and Accountability Act of 2016 — is scheduled for floor action Thursday after clearing Senate committees in April and May.

The measure would allow state and local prosecutors to pursue claims against climate-change skepticism as a violation of the state’s Unfair Competition Law [UCL], as well as extend the four-year statute of limitations for such claims retroactively to Jan. 1, 2021.

“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” says the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis.

While the measure enjoys broad support by a bevy of environmental groups, the bill has also been described as an effort to ban free speech on climate change as well as chill donations to free-market groups.

Stephen Frank, editor of the conservative California Political Review, called the bill a “totalitarian statement by Democrats that the First Amendment is now dead.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; 2016election; antoninscalia; bidenvoters; california; censorship; climatechange; deniers; election2016; epa; firstamendment; freedomofspeech; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; kamalaharris; lysenkoism; newyork; popefrancis; romancatholicism; sb1161; scalia; scotus; senatebill1161; texas; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: jazusamo

Unconstitutional.


21 posted on 06/02/2016 10:37:05 AM PDT by Snowybear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Will be shot down in the SCOTUS like a cheap drone.............................

The Constitution now says whatever the hell five out of nine Supreme Court Justices want it to say.

Currently, there are four far left wing liberals on SCOTUS, two conservatives, two in the squishy middle, and one vacancy. Three Justices will be over 80 years old when the next President takes office.

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

22 posted on 06/02/2016 10:40:52 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

This ‘law’ is a blatant and example of 1st Amendment destruction.........................


23 posted on 06/02/2016 10:45:10 AM PDT by Red Badger (Make America AMERICA again!..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

24 posted on 06/02/2016 10:45:41 AM PDT by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

You got me thinking about those lyrics to Silent Running:

Swear allegiance to the flag
Whatever flag they offer
Never hint at what you really feel
Teach the children quietly
For some day sons and daughters
Will rise up and fight while we stand still


25 posted on 06/02/2016 10:46:34 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Government sponsored “science” will be the ideology behind the new inquisition—with about as much validity to its claims.


26 posted on 06/02/2016 10:49:49 AM PDT by cgbg (Epistemology is not a spectator sport.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
This ‘law’ is a blatant and example of 1st Amendment destruction.........................

I totally agree.

Unfortunately, what the Constitution actually says is now totally irrelevant. All that matters is what five Supreme Court Justices want the Constitution to say.

27 posted on 06/02/2016 10:50:25 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Its unconstitutional because it puts the government in the business of enforcing political correctness.

Not that has ever mattered to the Democrats.


28 posted on 06/02/2016 10:53:41 AM PDT by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Bump!


29 posted on 06/02/2016 10:54:55 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

These people are stupid, they don’t realize that this law could be turned against them. There is so much bad information being put out by their side that is easily refutable.


30 posted on 06/02/2016 10:57:54 AM PDT by usurper (Liberals GET OFF MY LAWN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

When did the Washington times become satire?


31 posted on 06/02/2016 10:58:29 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Gee!

All Galileo had to do, after he dared speak truth, was recant. Luckily he did not live in Jerry Brown's California.

32 posted on 06/02/2016 10:58:33 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

California Democrat: All of our businesses are leaving the state! Oh my God what could possibly be wrong?

I know! We need to seize these businesses for the government to run! They can’t run then!

Then we can make everybody rich by paying a minimum wage of $100!

WINNING!


33 posted on 06/02/2016 11:00:01 AM PDT by angryoldfatman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

We’ve become a very un-serious country.


34 posted on 06/02/2016 11:01:51 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The religion of ‘climate fraud deniers’ will tolerate no dissent!
They are deathly afraid of a debate, because they will lose.
More democrats = less freedom.


35 posted on 06/02/2016 11:05:47 AM PDT by glasseye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I haven’t thought about that in years. Thank you.


36 posted on 06/02/2016 11:06:10 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
A landmark California bill gaining steam would make it illegal to engage in climate-change dissent, clearing the way for lawsuits against ... that have “deceived or misled the public on the risks of climate change.”

All the other states should then pass laws allowing lawfare against those that "deceived or misled the public on the risks of socialism".. sauce for the goose, mofos.

37 posted on 06/02/2016 11:07:21 AM PDT by vikingd00d (nulla seruitus turpior est quam uoluntaria -- Seneca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Probably just a yellow leaf embossed on a crescent.


38 posted on 06/02/2016 11:08:01 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Yet one more reason to look down on california. What a joke.


39 posted on 06/02/2016 11:10:43 AM PDT by LouAvul (Freedom without responsibility is anarchy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave
Will they have to wear a Yellow Star ?

Yes, but in this case instead of the Star of David, it will the Sun.

40 posted on 06/02/2016 11:10:49 AM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson