Tricky little pests.
sure it did... sounds like anything to cover up that it was blown up by muzzies
like someone said earlier... probably faulty wiring in the gas tank
What anomalies, list them. Now that the French are closing in on the black boxes the excuse making machine is getting cranked up.
hmmmm thats pretty odd 3 RTBs and NOTHING found? I dont think I have ever seen that. I get some stuff in that says some trouble , usually its not but 3 times in a row? That part should have been Quarantined...
Hmmm.
Hidden bomb that could be radio activated or cell phone activated?
System detects presence of unknown item searching for a signal or capable of receiving a signal?
The plot thickens.
Did they just find this Our? I don’t believe anything.
IT'S???? The apostrophized contraction for "it is"??? This is a journalist, a writer by profession????
The word this illiterate moron is looking for is ITS -- the third person singular genitive (possessive).
And fire the proofreader while you're at it.
I was on a flight a number of years ago that aborted a take-off. The pilot explained that he was getting an intermittent signal from an air flow sensor within the airplane. We waited for more than 6 hours to diagnose the problem. While waiting, I spent the time with a friend who happened to be on the airplane who was a military pilot. I told him I didn't understand why we would be delayed for so long when the sensor was no longer indicating a problem. He explained that pilot ALWAYS finds the source of a problem before flying an airplane, much less one with 250 people on board.
When we finally boarded the airplane, again, the pilot announced that a mouse nest was found and removed from an instrument cooling duct.
That said, I just can't imagine a pilot flying an airplane that experienced three emergency landings in one day, without finding the source of the problem.
And in the past two weeks we haven’t heard about this from former pilots or passengers of that plane???
I can’t find anything showing the flight making any emergency landings. I just checked FlightRadar24 and there is nothing there nor in any news.
As far as the ACARS is concerned when it goes off, it sends a report. What did the report say? It doesn’t say “There is an anomaly onboard”. It checks flight data systems, ambient temp, hydraulics, etc. It isn’t designed to see if something like a cell phone is transmitting or receiving data.
Sounds fishy to me. There is a lot of speculation going on but not too many facts. I’ve even been slammed on this site by someone stating that they had found the black box’s less than 7 days after the flight went down. Speculation.
I would assume after the second warning that jet would be impounded and every part of it would be inspected. I also assume both Boeing and Airbus have protocols for such situations along with international regulations.
Tricky little pests.
Once again,”If it ain’t Boeing, I ain’t going!”
Wasn’t the aircraft a substitute for the originally scheduled plane? Perhaps the original plane had these problems.
The flightradar24 link now shows no files on its history
"Sorry, but we could not find data for specified flight"
Quote from Heavy.com link:
"It’s registration is SU-GCC.The plane flew from Cairo to Paris earlier on May 18 and was making a return trip, according to FlightRadar24. You can see its full flight history here.
The plane had also flown from Asmara, Eritrea, where it had been overnight, to Cairo, and then from Cairo to Tunis, Tunisia. From there, it flew back to Cairo and then to Paris.
Routine maintenance checks were performed on the plane before the final flight from Paris to Cairo, officials told CNN.
Just curious, where are the Black boxes? This story is getting no attention as the media is focused on #Gorillalivesmatter and dirtying up Trump.
I wonder if the mechanics just killed the sensor causing the alarm on the third incident.
Reason #6 why I don’t fly anywhere, anymore, and haven’t since TWA 800 went down, in 1996. If I can’t drive there, I don’t need to go, and I’m not going.
...it’s warning systems ....
***
Really? “After it is warning systems” makes no sense.
These “journalists” are idiots!
I know, I know, proofreading is just so boring.