Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick

It took me a while to actually understand. The reason is that hardly any articles lay it out that way. Also the term ‘public bathroom’ and ‘publically owned bathroom’ seem to be used interchangeably. Maybe what the NC law should have done was allow Charlotte to let men use their publically owned exclusive areas if they want, but give the right choose back to private business. I don’t know.

Freegards


18 posted on 05/26/2016 7:42:40 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Ransomed

I don’t think the state legislature could pass a law making a general rule, but excepting the City of Charlotte. On the other hand, if the original Charlotte law had applied only to city-owned property, the state probably wouldn’t have gotten involved.


20 posted on 05/26/2016 8:05:21 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("We like us the way we are. That makes us real, true friends." ~ The Undead Thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson