Posted on 05/24/2016 10:28:11 AM PDT by Rennes Templar
Bizarre is right. What’s the world coming to? What if there had been a woman in the restroom? Or a child? Would they still have arrested the tranny?
There, fixed it.
For now that is.
Instead of removing Black Burp, he should have removed the women from the women’s restroom and he’d have still had his job. Right?
Stop the insanity.
Good point with the diaper stocks. I can see the tv commercials now, “When you just have to go, go without fear... of pervs.”
With online shopping, there will be less need for b&m stores with their unisex dressing rooms and toilets. To think we used to avoid public restrooms due to the germs.
From the article: Belcher told NBC4 that the security guard told him: You guys cannot keep coming in here and using our womens restroom." I can count on one hand the number of times I've had to use a grocery store restroom while shopping--in my entire adult lifetime. Yet, for this grocery store, it's "You guys, (plural) Keep...Coming. In. Here." In other words, the provocateurs are frequenting the place for the express purpose of "using" the restroom.
A very tiny fraction of the population even claims to be transgender. Divide that fractional number by the likelihood percentage of actual need to use a restroom at the precise time they're grocery shopping. That particular grocery store--even in Freak Central DC--should be seeing maybe three men a year, tops, wanting to use the women's restroom.
Because they haven't quite worked their way to arresting Christians yet.
Pretty sad that a supermarket needs a security guard.
“Ive wondered if any of these incidents are staged, and done purposely to gain sympathy .”
Oh. no doubt.
The inevitable lawsuits and subsequent judgements will have the same chilling - and silencing - effect it did on everything else the homosexuals targeted.
Unless the sane world delivers some major and sustained pushback.
The only thing that would have made this story more twisted is if it had happened in a Target.
And so it starts - trying to protect women and children is the latest “hate crime”. Unless we the People push back with vigorous energy, it will become the latest “standard”....
http://www.jammiewf.com/2016/female-security-guard-charged-with-assault-for-ushering-man-in-drag-out-of-ladies-room-in-dc-market/
Too lazy to make it clickable - simple copy/paste for those interested.
Well it’s DC.
But thinking about it more, maybe this “woman” intentionally used the woman’s room to evoke a response from the guard, to raise sympathy for the cause.
I also wonder what “she” used prior to Obama’s directive.
I am emotionally upset about the incident. The inmates are running the asylum.
“He told WJLA that he believed the woman had no reason to put her hands on me,...”
As soon as an agent of the business owner tells you to leave, and you refuse, you are trespassing, and can be ejected with necessary force.
If you think you are being ejected unfairly, you have the right to sue, but you don’t have the right to continue trespassing.
Exactly
. One only has to look to Amazon and their incredible growth. Everything to do with men in womens washrooms directly feeds into the narrative of why on earth would anyone want to visit a b&m store anymore. So Amazon stock increases even more. To your point about avoiding restrooms due to germs, that still is the case, no? Its just that the 'germs' have a name.... they are called perverts!
Correct. Anyone who thinks lawyers are NOT running this country are clueless. As Rush says, follow the money.
Makes one wonder where the owners sympathies lie. He should lawyer up if he supports his guard.
Love it!
Hey, you could perform a pretty quick lopadickoffamy operation with that I bet. They should thank you for saving them the medical bill.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.