Posted on 05/24/2016 9:29:41 AM PDT by Yollopoliuhqui
post # 10 ~ who is that in the picture you posted?
inquiring minds need to know...
Another reason the Left wants more muslim immigration. They are the perfect fascist, nanny-state citizen - stupid, dependent, credulous.
Cousin marriage is still legal in 20 states and in one other one with genetic counseling. Cousin marriage was not uncommon in England in the 19th century including among Jewish families.
Wow. This is worth a reread.
Muslim retard ping
Thank you for providing this invaluable post on Mohammedian muslim madness.
Everybody, fearlessly spread the word!
Where did you get the picture of my cousins? Well, maybe these fellows are a little smarter, and they are dressed better, but otherwise they are just about dead ringers.
Muhammad was a genius when he allowed in breeding. A requirement for being Muslim is to be stupid. The best way to have your Prodigy be stupid is through inbreeding. Thus securing the future of the Muslim faith
Unfortunately, they didn’t stop in time to prevent Wilhelm II of Grermany and WW I.
So you start with an entire inbred population of marginal retards with low intelligence and poor impulse control, add a religion that caters to their base instincts and demonizes all non-believers - bring them all here, they are ideal Democrat voters !
Good one! +10!
“Bunch of boobs, all of them with the Saudis being the worst.”
with inbreeding as the cause, the “Abdul factor” is actually a thing.
Philip the Fourth of Spain. Painted by Diego Velasquez. The Austrian Habsburgs had that characteristic under bite as well as hemophilia.
Compared to certain cultures of Jews, which have the highest IQ for a people group.
Add in the culture of child molestation, and you’ve got a great big chunk of the world’s population locked into an endless cycle of primal savagery.
There is a term called "social trust". Some societies have more than others.
In the West, when you walk past a person on the street, you do not expect them to stab you. When your daughter gets married, you are pretty sure her new husband is not going to beat her savagely on a regular basis.
Why? Because we have (or had, really) a high level of social trust in our society.
Muslimes do not have a high level of social trust. On the contrary, they are tribal and clan based. Everyone outside their group is their mortal enemy. When they walk down the street and sombody stabs them, well, that is not a shocker.
A universal human trait is the love of a child (even an inferior girl) by the parents. However, the muslim father has no way of preventing his daughter's new husband from beating her every day, or even murdering her. It is simply our of his purview after the marriage ceremony, since females are property solely.
One way he exerts influence and assures her safety is by marrying her off to someone that he knows in his tiny, insular world who he has some sort of influence over: His cousin's son.
Crazy, I know, but those people are purely tribal.
Everybody here should read "The Haj" by Leon Uris. The lack of social trust is pretty much spelled out.
Pretty sure that’s Philip IV of Spain. Definitely a Hapsburg. That chin!
I think the key point is, that even though marriage to first cousins is legal in those states does not mean it is institutional and occurs endemically.
However, it is both institutional AND endemic in most muslim communities.
And it has been for a long time. That is a problem.
Only nine Muslims have ever won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the “Peace Prize.”
Is our very own dear leader, one of the big nine?
The inbreeding has not worked fast enough. What this world really needs is a fresh revelation that Mohammad married a sister and sanctioned the same for his followers. That ought to speed things up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.