How Anti-White Rhetoric Is Fueling White Nationalism

The Federalist ^ | May 23, 2016 | David Marcus

[Pelham]

‘Dump 10 million Chinese into Mexico and watch how quickly “Mexican Nationalism” is fueled.’

Mexican nationalism is very potent and can be fueled by even 10 ‘Chinos’, much less a million. They are unapologetically racialist and aren’t keen on diversity in the barrio- that’s something you are expected to deal with in your neighborhood, not theirs. There’s a reason that La Raza “the Race” is the name of the latino political power organization.

[Pelham]

“What alternate universe does he inhabit?! Whites are not only dumped on by the mass media ( as he notes), but openly discriminated against in employment, promotions, college admissions and hiring, and in an increasing number of high- profile judicial proceedings ( with Obama leading the way with an openly racist doj).”

This has been known about and accepted, even encouraged, by the ruling class in both parties. I ran into this discrimination in the early 70s when trying to get hired for various jobs. I was openly told by the HR people that the jobs were reserved for anyone who wasn’t white.

Frederick Lynch wrote about this back in 1991 in his “
Invisible Victims: White Males and the Crisis of Affirmative Action”

http://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Victims-Crisis-Affirmative-Action/dp/0275941027

[Billthedrill]

The author could use a stern but sympathetic editor - most of this is pretty fluffy stuff but there's a couple of nuggets down in there. This, for example, I did not know:

Peggy McIntosh, whose 1988 essay “Unpacking The Invisible Knapsack” formed the foundation of privilege theory.

I suspect that essay was actually more of a starting gun than anything foundational, but that really was right about when Critical Race Theory hit the street in academia from its starting place in the darker nooks and crannies that once held Aryan Race Theory. The son stoutly refuses to recognize the father there, but that is pretty much irrelevant to the fact.

It is, however, a self-fulfilling prophecy that categorizing a population based on the hue of its members' epidermis is likely to produce a certain insularity. Pointing to that insularity as a new phenomenon is a little disingenuous if it's you who helped produce it. We're in Captain Obvious territory here.

From 2014 to 2015, the number of active Klu Klux Klan chapters in the United States grew from 72 to 190, a massive increase for a group so closely associated with hatred.

Really? Who says so? The author has not provided a citation for this rather remarkable statistic, and the only such claim I've read in popular literature is from the Southern Poverty Law Center, hardly a disinterested party in the matter. But unsurprisingly, if there is a sudden, unexpected, and concerted campaign against such symbols as the Confederate flag and the memorials to its heroes, there's likely to be a reaction. For the Left to point at this as evidence of a resurgence of racism is fantastically hypocritical.

The real issue is that the discussion of racism proceeded from the racist premise that only whites could be guilty of it, by virtue of a little ideological flim-flam associated with power relationships (Michael Foucault is spinning in his grave). In short, the speaker is exempt from the crime of which he accuses others. It's profoundly dishonest and everyone in the debate knows it, and it poisons any potentially fruitful discussion of the topic and trends the discussers toward a tribalism they may not have felt in the beginning. That is why you can't have that "dialogue about race" that the Left is always yammering about. On their terms, under their premises, there's no point, the conclusion is foregone and simply a matter of admitting guilt for any accusation they can devise. It is, in that sense, a monologue.

It may be distasteful to the social justice warriors, but the fact of the matter is that most Americans really don't care a great deal about race as a normative issue. You can make someone care by repeatedly slapping him in the face, but that sort of caring isn't always very productive.

[Chuckster]

THE WRATH OF THE AWAKENED SAXON
by Rudyard Kipling

It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late,
With long arrears to make good,
When the Saxon began to hate.

They were not easily moved,
They were icy — willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the Saxon began to hate.

Their voices were even and low.
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd.
It was not taught by the state.
No man spoke it aloud
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not suddenly bred.
It will not swiftly abate.
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the Saxon began to hate.

[Roman_War_Criminal]

Yes I’m well aware of Mexican racialists. I lived in México for about 10 years. I was trying to point out the hypocrisy of dumping 30 million of them here and them wondering why Trump is so popular.

Chinese illegals are starting to become very noticed in Mexico over the last few years. It has caused “problems”. But Mexico doesn’t hand them over billions in welfare either and they usually make their way over here or get deported.

[dfwgator]

They would be wise to remember:

When Blacks riot: Cities burn.
When Whites riot: Continents burn.

[Pelham]

I was actually trying to agree with and amplify your observations, although probably not very clearly on my part.

[Roman_War_Criminal]

My reading comprehension is a bit off today, so it’s probably my error.

[Pelham]

No problem.

I’m just glad to see someone with a clear understanding of Mexican culture considering that the GOPe and their Obama comrades are helping it to displace America.

[Zionist Conspirator]

The radical anti-white rhetoric of the Left together with some very nasty people Trump has (perhaps unwittingly) moved more towards the mainstream are acting as a pincer movement to push whites into the same idolatrous chromosome worship that the ethnic Left engages in. It's scary. And Jews and Israel will be the number one target in the cross hairs.

"Nationalism" is bandied about as the only alternative to "globalism." Actually they are false alternatives based on a false, G-dless metaphysics. The white racialism of the European Right is blatantly pagan, even when it invokes chrstianity (a religion it identifies with only because it was so long ago adopted by Europe that it became "the European religion").

"Nationalism" actually implies much much more than merely a world of sovereign states as opposed to a one world government. It implies that religions are created by peoples from their own unique make-up and experiences. In other words they are all false; they're just another characteristic of ethnicity. The "gxd" of "nationalists" is a pagan, idolatrous national totem--not the One True G-d Who created and rules all things. But between the torrent of one-worldism and anti-whitism, many conservatives are simply sick and tired of it all and moving onto dangerous ground.

Nations may create "gxds" but they never created G-d. G-d created all nations, the good and the bad.

This is why whenever I read posts extolling "nationalism" and "America First" (as if there were no G-d apart from American identity) my blood runs cold.

No one who sincerely believes in a one true religion can, deep down, deny that at the end of time one religion must triumph over all overs as the religion of all mankind. To deny this is to deny Monotheism.

G-d help us.

[Crucial]

I’m not speaking of policy but an increasing racial self-awareness among whites. Politicians will have to respond to this new attitude. Politicians have to tap into what motivates people and craft policy to satiate those attitudes.

I don’t advocate racism or race war but I don’t think white people should deny that they have a racial identity. It’s not healthy to deny reality or allow other races to delegitimize the traits that you are born with. It erodes at the rights of any racial group and I think whites have instinctively begun to fear that erosion.

[rdb3]

W E B Dubois is someone I need to read more of. I suspect that he might have seen the possibility of the grievance industry that Booker T Washington foresaw.

Dubois was the initiator of the grievance industry!

He disliked Booker T. Washington with a passion. Washington said "cast down your bucket where you stand." Dubois said "We claim for ourselves every single right that belongs to a freeborn American, political, civil and social; and until we get these rights we will never cease to protest and assail the ears of America."

I think it was poetic justice that Dubois died an embittered communist.

Jesus Christ: You can't impeach Him and He ain't gonna resign.

[Fred Hayek]

Checked further. There seemed to be no totalitarian regime he didn’t like. He praised Hitler, the Japanese occupation on Manchuria, Stalin, Mao, all at once. The more atrocities the better in his view. Evil.