Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/20/2016 3:28:38 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

Does the legislature have enough to override


2 posted on 05/20/2016 3:34:51 PM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Interesting idea...but it wouldn’t last 5 minutes in the Federal courts.


3 posted on 05/20/2016 3:41:01 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obamanomics:Trickle Up Poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Fallin is positioning herself to be the “moderate” VP.


4 posted on 05/20/2016 3:41:50 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Well there goes my support for her...I was thinking she might be a good VP....scratch her off my list...


5 posted on 05/20/2016 3:48:35 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

What constitutional legal challenge. Roe v Wade was pulled out of Blackmum’s ass.


7 posted on 05/20/2016 4:01:51 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (MAGA! Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
Even a legal dummy knows it will fail in the courts. She did right.

Roe vs Wade has to be overturned.

9 posted on 05/20/2016 4:07:19 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
“The bill is so ambiguous and so vague that doctors cannot be certain what medical circumstances would be considered ‘necessary to preserve the life of the mother,” Fallin said. “The absence of any definition, analysis or medical standard renders this exception vague, indefinite and vulnerable to subjective interpretation and application.”

I can't believe she used the pro-abort fear mongering 1% exception card.

Over 1,000 signatures:

“As experienced practitioners and researchers in obstetrics and gynaecology, we affirm that direct abortion – the purposeful destruction of the unborn child – is not medically necessary to save the life of a woman.

We uphold that there is a fundamental difference between abortion, and necessary medical treatments that are carried out to save the life of the mother, even if such treatment results in the loss of life of her unborn child.

We confirm that the prohibition of abortion does not affect, in any way, the availability of optimal care to pregnant women.”

http://www.dublindeclaration.com/

If a woman's life is truly in danger, she will be in a hospital. Removal of the baby would be life saving treatment and not abortion. She's not going to be in an abortion facility.

Scratch her off the VP list.

10 posted on 05/20/2016 4:11:53 PM PDT by Pinkbell (Liberal tolerance only extends to people they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

She is pro-life and would like to see Roe vs. Wade reversed.


11 posted on 05/20/2016 4:15:37 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Good. This would be a huge election year PR disaster, it would be ruled unconstitutional by the courts, accomplishing NOTHING of value except giving Hitlery ammunition for her “war on woman” campaign theme.

The Gov. is on the short list for VP. Near the top, as I’ve predicted elsewhere.


20 posted on 05/20/2016 5:03:08 PM PDT by Jack Black (Dispossession is an obliteration of memory, of place, and of identity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson