Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gov. Fallin vetoes bill that would make performing an abortion a felony [OK]
KFOR, NBC News Channel 4, Oklahoma City ^ | 3:50 PM, May 20, 2016 | KFOR-TV and K. Querry

Posted on 05/20/2016 3:28:38 PM PDT by Olog-hai

One day after lawmakers passed a bill that would make performing an abortion a felony, Gov. Mary Fallin decided to veto the measure.

On Thursday, the Oklahoma Legislature has passed a bill that would make performing an abortion a felony punishable by up to three years in prison. […]

On Friday, Gov. Mary Fallin vetoed the measure, saying the bill was “vague” and “would not withstand a criminal constitutional legal challenge.” …

(Excerpt) Read more at kfor.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: abortion; gopestablishment; maryfallin; moralabsolutes; prolife; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 05/20/2016 3:28:38 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Does the legislature have enough to override


2 posted on 05/20/2016 3:34:51 PM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Interesting idea...but it wouldn’t last 5 minutes in the Federal courts.


3 posted on 05/20/2016 3:41:01 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obamanomics:Trickle Up Poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Fallin is positioning herself to be the “moderate” VP.


4 posted on 05/20/2016 3:41:50 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Well there goes my support for her...I was thinking she might be a good VP....scratch her off my list...


5 posted on 05/20/2016 3:48:35 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Exactly.


6 posted on 05/20/2016 3:58:19 PM PDT by griswold3 (Just another unlicensed nonconformist in am dangerous Liberal world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

What constitutional legal challenge. Roe v Wade was pulled out of Blackmum’s ass.


7 posted on 05/20/2016 4:01:51 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (MAGA! Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

rather than veto, a better course might be to clean up and strengthen the bill


8 posted on 05/20/2016 4:03:26 PM PDT by Thibodeaux (leading from behind is following)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Even a legal dummy knows it will fail in the courts. She did right.

Roe vs Wade has to be overturned.

9 posted on 05/20/2016 4:07:19 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
“The bill is so ambiguous and so vague that doctors cannot be certain what medical circumstances would be considered ‘necessary to preserve the life of the mother,” Fallin said. “The absence of any definition, analysis or medical standard renders this exception vague, indefinite and vulnerable to subjective interpretation and application.”

I can't believe she used the pro-abort fear mongering 1% exception card.

Over 1,000 signatures:

“As experienced practitioners and researchers in obstetrics and gynaecology, we affirm that direct abortion – the purposeful destruction of the unborn child – is not medically necessary to save the life of a woman.

We uphold that there is a fundamental difference between abortion, and necessary medical treatments that are carried out to save the life of the mother, even if such treatment results in the loss of life of her unborn child.

We confirm that the prohibition of abortion does not affect, in any way, the availability of optimal care to pregnant women.”

http://www.dublindeclaration.com/

If a woman's life is truly in danger, she will be in a hospital. Removal of the baby would be life saving treatment and not abortion. She's not going to be in an abortion facility.

Scratch her off the VP list.

10 posted on 05/20/2016 4:11:53 PM PDT by Pinkbell (Liberal tolerance only extends to people they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

She is pro-life and would like to see Roe vs. Wade reversed.


11 posted on 05/20/2016 4:15:37 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Lots of RINOs say they are, in order to get elected. Even mild support of Medicaid expansion (hence Obamacare, which is by definition pro-abortion) indicates a different real stance.
12 posted on 05/20/2016 4:30:36 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Won’t happen by mere Supreme Court appointments.


13 posted on 05/20/2016 4:31:25 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Interesting idea...but it wouldn’t last 5 minutes in the Federal courts.

That's not a problem. It's an opportunity.

14 posted on 05/20/2016 4:32:05 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot

One of u got it right and most of u got it rong. She IS positioning herself for VP. She is smart enough to veto a bill that will not stand up in court-a waste of time. That way she presents herself as a pragmatist.


15 posted on 05/20/2016 4:37:21 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Forgot to mention-she’s hot!


16 posted on 05/20/2016 4:37:55 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Interesting idea...but it wouldn’t last 5 minutes in the Federal courts.

From the article, "Fallin wrote. “In fact, the most direct path to a re-examination of the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Roe v. Wade is the appointment of a conservative, pro-life justice to the United States Supreme Court.”"

17 posted on 05/20/2016 4:39:10 PM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (See my home page for some of my answers to the left's talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TwelveOfTwenty

We’ve had those, but no movement on same. It’s been 43 years.


18 posted on 05/20/2016 4:43:22 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

The left likes to tie up the courts with frivolous cases. So does Islam.


19 posted on 05/20/2016 4:45:00 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Good. This would be a huge election year PR disaster, it would be ruled unconstitutional by the courts, accomplishing NOTHING of value except giving Hitlery ammunition for her “war on woman” campaign theme.

The Gov. is on the short list for VP. Near the top, as I’ve predicted elsewhere.


20 posted on 05/20/2016 5:03:08 PM PDT by Jack Black (Dispossession is an obliteration of memory, of place, and of identity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson