Posted on 05/17/2016 7:26:30 AM PDT by xzins
So she supports using the full coercive power and force of the federal government to give in to the unreasonable demands of the democrat party’s biggest voting and contribution block?
I don’t think Obama is hold the FBI investigation over her head on this one. As a socialist, she WANTS to be able to define reality for people as an important step toward tyranny.
Now, the good news is that it is now not working.
Simple: it’s an idiocracy now.
“That is a law that restricts bathrooms, locker rooms, showers, teams, etc to those of their biological sex at birth.”
Do businesses still get to choose to let men into their women’s bathrooms if they want? Is this law only for publically owned sex exclusive areas or what?
Freegards
Immoral freak show.
These two, obammy and mrs clintoon are both disgusting.
It depends on what the Federal government chooses to enforce.
It would be as a counter to whatever they require.
Democrats used to scream “keep the government out of our bedrooms”.
Then they screamed “we need the government in our bathrooms”.
Now I’m really scared about the recreation room.
The harridan will support, endorse, say, do or otherwise indicate anything that diverts attention away from the fact there is no ‘there’ there with her with regard to anything substantive.
The more she and her cabal can get talking about what she ‘supports’ or doesn’t or what she thinks about policy, agenda or goals instead of what she has actually done, is trying to hide, is lying about her email server, et al the better for her.
Keep the focus on her treachery and blatant disregard for our safety (in keeping this nation’s deliberations and communications close) and screw this “what she thinks” or “what she’ll do” crap.
We KNOW what she’ll do. She’ll get even richer and more powerful and MORE people will die because of it.
That’s the focus.
How does Trump’s policy for his properties differ from Target’s policy? It might actually be different, but I’m not sure exactly how from what he has said about it.
Freegards
These people are walking contradictions, and they simply don’t care.
So Hillary is against women’s safety.
All I have actually read that he said is that he’d let Bruce Jenner use whatever restroom he wants at Trump Tower.
He also said to ‘keep it like it is’ regarding the law.
Have you heard otherwise?
Yes.
She doesn’t care about kids either.
But if the feds mandate that private businesses have to let men or the genderedwhatevers into their women’s exclusive areas, isn’t the conservative counter-move not to require the opposite, but just to give private business back the ability to choose fro themselves? That’s what the NC law did.
Now publically owned bathrooms/areas are something else.
Freegards
Democrats are 180 degrees wrong on everything. If it is an obvious wrong, such as killing unborn babies, disarming citizens or putting mentally ill boys in girls locker rooms then the democrats go all in.
Trump’s position seems to be that since 0.001% of the population is trans-gendered, it is a non-issue that should not distract him from the economy, Muslims or immigration.
He has a point as far as it goes. But there are much broader implications here.
I’ve heard him say folks should use whatever bathroom they want, in regards to a man who claims to be woman. Now, that could be because he personally knows Jenner or Jennner is famous I guess. And it is property, so fine.
Freegards
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.