Hillary Clinton is going to be exonerated on the email controversy. It won’t matter.

The Washington Post ^ | May 6 2016 | By Paul Waldman

[billyboy15]

This exact article was posted 4 days ago. It is no longer news.

[Mr. K]

I did a search!!
I swear

[SPRINK]

Remember they (FBI) were supposed to be mass resignations if The Justus dept didn’t prosecute. It was a done deal. We were hoodwink once again.

[cpdiii]

I think the Washington Post pulled this memo out of James Carvilles butt.

[billyboy15]

Ok, try harder next time.

The date of story should have been a giveaway.

[Marys Lamb]

This same BS article has been circulated throughout the Leftist Media Complex for the past week. It is a LIE

Thank you for saying that. It pulled me out of my depression. I was confused because Jim Comey, the FBI Director, is supposed to be a straight shooter.

[itsahoot]

That point about her intending to break classification rules is important,

It isn't even about the classified emails it is about the double dealing and sweetheart deals she negotiated as SS. Those emails were purged to hide how corrupt she really is. The classified stuff is just a Straw Man diversion.

Few here seem to remember that the Clintons, when Bill took office, immediately installed a totally separate computer system in order to subvert the official records act.

[VeniVidiVici]

So according to the WaPo I can bring classified info home and put it in my nightstand with no repercussions.

Ah. The must be thinking of Sandy Berger.

[Mr. K]

I don’t know what else to do.. I put in “Hillary” and searched by keyword, “Exonerated” by keyword, and the full title- but nothing showed up

After 2 decades of begging for $340K per year you would think they could keep the site modern

I could program and maintain it with modern features for half of that

[billyboy15]

Robinson is surely making a profit. As a committed capitalist I have no problem with this.

[Mr. K]

I don’t have a problem with that at all- I have OFTEN tried to get him to go more commercial and accept advertising.

But he repeatedly insists that would be selling out to “the man” or something...

I tried to say that he does not have to compromise his principles- just don’t take money from anyone who asks you oo AND REPORT on them...

This site should be making $millions, and it was (at one time) one of the most powerful voices for conservatism on the interwebs.

I see lost opportunity for making lots of money, hiring people and providing jobs, and most important of all, having a huge conservative voice. Libtard sites like “MoveOn.org” and “Salon.com” make $millons