If Trump had as high negatives as the MSM claims he has, he wouldn't have gotten as many votes as he has, even among Republicans.
In the general election he will also get Dem and Independents voting for him, to "Make America Great Again".
This is a speech during the primaries.
The anti-American crowd hates Trump. They are also the only ones who will vote for Hillary.
I remember the first time I heard this birdcage liner of a newspaper called the “Washington Compost.” It was LTC Oliver North.
It’s the WaPo. Leftist crap articles like this is what they do.
I find Trump very likable in a number of different ways.
And I was a person who could not stand him and had zero respect for him when he announced.
Things change, perceptions are fluid. He won me over.
Hillary has the negatives, not Trump. They just say he has negatives to make him seem equal to Hillary. But it’s bunk.
Yes they’re both hated.
Trump hated mostly be the left, and some on the right.
Hillary hated by the right, and some on the left.
Where’s the love?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/25/AR2010062504413.html
And then it tunes put he was one of the DC Obama journalists who secretly conspired to get Obama elected by manipulating the new cycle.
This far left con man is pack at the Compost !
Wow.
Trump will get moire likeable when scrutinized to those who dislike him now. Hillary, not so much.
Clinton is widely hated by D voters. Trump is not widely hated by anyone other than the mass media elites ( who nevertheless make $ because of him).
The wash post is owned by the fascist uniparty machine. They want Clinton of course and will try to cram her down the D party voters’ throats -— the post is afraid of trump because he’s the one R candidate that can get a lot of D votes (because he’s quite leftist in some ways and because he’s charismatic ). The Post will keep making up Krap about him
WAPO is very high on my do-not-patronize list.
It’s an old liberal trick to do the equal pox thing to take the shine off someone new. Hillary is hated. They can’t deny it, so Trump has to be seen as hated. Their reporting will try to bring that about.
Everything the Wapo reports is a lie. They’ve been covering for liberals for decades after running Nixon and trying to run Reagan.
He (Trump) apparently has higher negative ratings and primary votes than McCain or Romney.
Anyone can make up the fake polling data and make the word ‘disliked’ into some fraudulent phrase. It is a humorous article and has little to do with reality.
Go and talk to a hundred regular democrats (actually working guys, not students, journalists or idiots living under bridges). In private conversations...more than a quarter will admit that they can find a way in their heart to vote for Trump. It is the same formula that Reagan had in the first campaign where blue-dog democrats came out in the south and assured the victory. It’s a repeat of the success from that one single year.
My suspicion is that the news media and lobbyists are screwed because they can’t manipulate the message or force into corners. If he does create a million-plus jobs in his first four years....there’s nothing much they can do to go negative on him. That’s really the bulk of this story....if he can just achieve what he says.
As I’ve said all along, the media selected your candidates and the American people went right along with them. Whoever had their faces plastered on the screen the most got the votes. The media had control over the message, the time allotted on screen and who created the most revenue for them. Both Trump and Hillary got the most “hits”. A goldmine for the media agency’s.
LOL Trump just had 28,000 attending his West Virginia rally!
The year of the hated: the NY TIMES andd the Washington Post, two intensely disliked commie rags, spew out their propaganda