[Beautiful_Gracious_Skies]

There is a haunting contradiction between the way that the U.S. government has handled and cloistered the documents regarding JFK and the way the MSM treats the assassination of the 35th President.

If Oswald acted alone, if none of it meant anything except madness and random death, how does “national security” come into the picture?

Continue to treat the JFK story as unworthy of serious attention and joke at the expense of conspiracy theorists. Be sure and leave a sneering reminder that JFK wasn’t much of a president anyway or that he got what he had coming to him.

On the other hand, our government treats the JFK story so serious that it keeps 3,500 files on lock-down which the public must not see for fifty years or indefinitely, all in the name of “national security.”

You can’t have it both ways.

[hoosiermama]

Well said BGS. Maybe Jim should look into a few people as government (or political) operatives visiting the site and stirring up conflict
You are correct. They cannot have it both ways. Either it merited national security for fifty years or is insignificant. ......Or is being hidden to protect individuals not the nation

[Theo]

So you truly believe that Cruz helped conspire to kill JFK?

[trebb]

I personally believe that Johnson was up to his eyeballs in the JFK assassination. As far as this election cycle, it is a irrelevant as can be, as far as Cruz's father being involved to any degree, since Cruz dropped out.

I'm not saying none of it matters or it shouldn't be resolved with the Truth, I'm just saying that it is a distraction that won't have diddly to do with this election cycle.

If the Truth comes out and Cruz's father was involved, then he needs to be treated accordingly and it would likely mean the end of Cruz in politics.