Posted on 05/08/2016 7:55:24 PM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Once again Donald Trump is frazzling the custodians of civil discourse.......
But dismissing JFK’s assassination as a trivial subject is one mistake that Donald Trump does not make. His gambit is an old story in American culture. With his intuitive media personality, Trump is drawn, moth-like, to an eternal flame of American culture: the JFK story.........
The issue facing the next president–and those who will vote for him or her– is not “Who killed JFK?” The issue in 2016 is “Who will kill JFK secrecy?”
The Law::::::Within a year of taking the oath of office President Trump (or President Clinton) will have to make some decisions about a huge trove ancient U.S. government records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963. The issue will come to a head as October 25, 2017 approaches. That is the date that the 1992 JFK Records Act requires the government to release all of its records related to JFK assassination.................
The Loophole::::But the JFK Records has a loophole and the loophole is what makes the political issue of 2016. The CIA (and other government agencies) have the right, under the JFK Records Act, to postpone release of these records past October 2017 for reasons of “national security.”.......
What will President Donald Trump do about the release of JFK records in his first term?
+1
Whatever Family Cruz might actually be, they are not as they wish to appear.
While that's the norm for politics these days, and is almost expected with political candidates running for any office, theirs is an illusion of another kind.
When Family Cruz and their entourage took their shtick on an evangelical tour, with flattering lips and deception in their hearts, their appearance eventually became clear enough to make voters say, "Trump!".
"Tower, this is Ghost Liar requesting POTUS."
"Negative, Ghost Liar, your closet is full."
And now, in a "never saw that coming" kind of way, thanks to young Felito and his ego and ambitions, Rafael "Papa" Cruz appears to be a loose thread of another kind.
A loose thread that, when given a good, steady tug, will perhaps begin to unravel this unholy tapestry our truth's long been tightly wrapped in.
Fascinating...
Depends on who is writing the history.
{sigh} It’ll get re-written anyway.
[I have lost hope for our Republic.]
Didn’t many witnesses and/or people allegedly involved die “under mysterious circumstances” after the assassination? I think there was an insurance actuary who calculated the chances of this randomly happening as astronomical.
Exactly. And Trump knew this and this is why he sometimes “just blurts out crazy stuff” and he says it so casually like a bad rumor, so that he just looks like a guy who sometimes speaks off the cuff, I don’t know, I heard, some say, etc. Playing dumb is always smart.
Which SHOULD have Hillary pretty scared. This far in her life, she’s escaped justice on Vince Foster because “this is old, been discussed, not this again” and a Trump won’t be following her guidelines. Nor is she going to disembowel Trump’s cat in the Penthouse of Trump Tower. She can’t hide her crap from Trump nor get to him. Game over, witch.
Theo, I am not your brain, draw your own conclusions. Reread the article and the links. Believe as you will. My brain recognizes oddities from the norm and discards most - until they become too overwhelming. Eventually for Rafael, the antenna stay up and fail to go down. Same with Ted’s announcement speech at Liberty University. His speech and gesticulating were out of sync with his eye movements.
Your turn to explain:
1. Cruz kid claims to be jailed & beat up in prison in Cuba- neighbors claim it’s all lie.
2. Cruz claims fighting for Castro - fellow Cubans dispute his timeline & whereabouts.
3. Cruz claims he assumed another Cuban’s name, very similar to his own & used it for ID.
4. Cruz’s claims he arrived in Florida by Ferry, records show him on a flight into Key West.
5. Cruz claims he took a train from Key West to Austin. There was no rail service for such route.
6. Cruz claims to have $100 sew in his underwear; embellished story of children flown from Cuba 1960-62 -Operation Pedro Pan
7. Cruz claims to have been granted immediate entrance to UT Austin and began University coursework; he spoke no English.
8. Cruz claims to be broke. Who funded his tuition, room, and board; washing dishes at 50cents, ‘round the clock, uh-huh, sure.
9. Cruz receives a Math & Chemical Engineering degree (A joint-combo degree?) in four years (again struggling with English.)
10. Cruz finds time to date, marry, have two kids, wash dishes, learn English, earn a degree in Mathematics & Chem. Engineering.
Please offer a rational explanation, these discrepancies set the foundation for the next 20+.
Ok. Very interesting photo on blackbaggawker.com “why that could actually be picture of Rafael Cruz”. -— yes the picture of the guy with the leaflets could possibly be Cruz and as you scroll down thru thus article there is a picture of a man in horn rimmed glasses that to me favors Malcolm Wallace to a tee, the writer tries to compare the image to Cruz, but the guy looks like Wallace to me.
Could you post a direct link to that article? Thanks!
Google it
Blackbag.gawker.com why that could actually be Rafael Cruz ...
Pay attention to the photo of jfk in convertible, look at the 2 men in the background. Then the next picture is a close up of horn rim glasses man.
The man in front of him looks like a young ghwbush.
On a thread on Facebook GHWBush was also in Dallas same day, hmmm ???
I'm not saying none of it matters or it shouldn't be resolved with the Truth, I'm just saying that it is a distraction that won't have diddly to do with this election cycle.
If the Truth comes out and Cruz's father was involved, then he needs to be treated accordingly and it would likely mean the end of Cruz in politics.
Was Wallace experienced in his line of work that brought him to Dallas?
Would it be reasonable to suggest that they first orchestrated a series of failed kill attempts on Fidel coordinated with mafia types. (Perhaps the failed attempts on Castro were designed to fail in order to escalate drama and establish the probable cause for deserved retribution.)
Simultaneously, they planted operatives in FPCC and DRE to publicly display a direct link between Oswald and the Castro government. All the while, the CIA side-steps their direct role and this charade continues indefinitely, even throughout the aftermath.
I have an environmental engineering degree so i feel somewhat qualified to comment on just Point #9. Of course engineering requires many math courses, it is not uncommon for engineers to go ahead and get a dual degree in engineering and math. It is also no unheard of to finish in 4 years; I know a few who have even while holding a job, though 5 years is more typical.
>>Depends on who is writing the history.
{sigh} It’ll get re-written anyway.
[I have lost hope for our Republic.]
Hi Daffy,
Yes, it will get “re-written anyway”, same as all history. At the same time, it’s a good mystery screaming to be solved...
Sadly, IMO, the Republic has been gone for a very long time. It seems to have “disappeared” in 1865.....but, it’s probably healthy to hold near to our hearts the hope for Liberty restored...
Keep the faith, my FRiend,
RWL
The hairline is completely different. As regards the man in front of him, the elder Bush didn’t wear glasses in the early 1960’s, and the hair is also different here from photos of him at the time.
I also have pointed out the hairline difference. It’s pretty apparent for anyone that wants to look. But, people want it to be true because it confirms for them all of the other false info they “know” about Cruz.
What was wrong with the photograph of the protestors from the JFK site?
Freepmail
Thank you for the encouraging words darling. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.