Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chae

Your argument comes from the idea that these criminals are logical and have good reasoning skills. On the contrary, most believe they will not be caught and take advantage of weakness when it is shown (like one person walking alone when there are ten of them.) As it stands, would it be better to execute them now or release them in 20 years where they could become a repeat offender at another woman’s or women’s expense?

It appears that Sweden is very bad about catching rapists. They also have super lax laws on murder, with 10 to 18 years or possibly life in prison for murder. While -18yo get a max of 14 years. They do brag about their low prison numbers and their re-offender rate being around 40% (Sooo, nearly half are repeat offenders? That is too high for my liking)


27 posted on 05/04/2016 1:32:56 PM PDT by VaeVictis (~Woe to the Conquered~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: VaeVictis; chae
Contrary to popular belief, criminals do calculate the risks. Rape is usually a planned act, not an impulsive crime of passion. It is usually committed by habitual criminals, generalists you might say. They figure the odds, and sometimes judge those odds well, sometimes poorly. But making rape a capital crime means that killing the main witness against you incurs no added punishment, and may aid in escaping punishment.

Better to have a living victim and a living criminal in prison than a dead victim and a criminal that may remain on the loose and not ever get caught at all.

37 posted on 05/04/2016 1:54:55 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson