Given this statement, I think his articles or interviews should be banned here. He’s not a part of the solution, but he has apparently been part of the problem all along.
“Given this statement, I think his articles or interviews should be banned here. Hes not a part of the solution, but he has apparently been part of the problem all along.”
________________________________________
I agree. This should be considered his opus.
+1
For decades, the RNC/DNC has had this comfortable agreement to "contest" elections along prescribed lines, leaving each side with 45% or so of the electorate. 2016 was supposed to the same, but Trump pulled a Nelson: he's gone right up the middle, carving out massive parts of the remainder.
So now we have a minority in the RNC with no place to go - big, crony businesses in favor of open borders. After Trump grabs a big portion of the DNC middle, they too will be left with a fringe (ie the Bernie supporters).
So the challenge for any DC insiders is to somehow create a new party of these two disparate pieces, otherwise the (former) DNC/RNC will be left with 10-20% on either side, while the new GOP - re-fashioned as a nationalist/populist party by Trump - will command the middle 60%.
There are monuments & squares named after Nelson & Trafalgar, and it remains a key turning point in European/UK history. The rift Trump is creating is destroying decades of presumed national direction.
You’re just finding this out now?
He makes his living pontificating about how the country's problems should be solved in a "conservative" way. If anybody started actually taking effective action, he would be irrelevant.