Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No, Ted Cruz was not ‘John Boehner’s lawyer’
New Zeal ^ | 4/28/16 | Renee nal

Posted on 04/29/2016 11:23:34 AM PDT by OneVike

John Boehner via stanforddaily

The media is working hard to convince you that they caught Ted Cruz in a lie about working with John Boehner. But they are the ones lying, as usual.

During an interview hosted by Stanford in Government (SIG) and the Stanford Speakers Bureau, former House Speaker John Boehner referred to presidential candidate Ted Cruz as “Lucifer in the flesh.” He continued, “I have Democrat friends and Republican friends. I get along with almost everyone, but I have never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life.”

But Boehner did not “work” with Ted Cruz. Boehner only worked against Cruz as he golfed with Trump, who Boehner referred to as his “texting buddy.”

The comments are reminiscent of other nasty names Boehner has used to describe the constant anti-establishment thorn in his side. Last year, the failed Speaker referred to Cruz as a “jackass,” and still another time as a “false prophet.



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio; US: Texas; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: 2016election; cfr; cruz; election; election2016; goldmansachs; jimmcdermott; johnboehner; lyinted; ohio; speakerboehner; speakerjohnboehner; tedcruz; texas; trump; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
Twice the lie was posted on FR, that Ted Cruz was John Boehner's personal lawyer in a case where he supposedly defended Boehner over the recorded phone call he had with NewtGingrich.

WaPo: Ted Cruz Was John Boehner's Lawyer (via newsmax.com)

John Boehner once hired Ted Cruz to be his lawyer (via bussinessinsider.com)

Turns out Cruz was a junior associate on that case. Cruz rightfully doesn’t remember even meeting Boehner, much less ever having had a substantive conversation with him.

Again, Freepers seem to like promoting people from minor positions they held in the past just to attack him.

In the old days we had proper balance on things when a lie was posted. Well, I like the old days, so here is some balance
1 posted on 04/29/2016 11:23:34 AM PDT by OneVike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OneVike

It doesn’t matter who’s lawyer he has or has not been, it’s the fact that he’s a lawyer, period!


2 posted on 04/29/2016 11:25:09 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Where is the actual rebuttal?

Or is this to be an article of faith?


3 posted on 04/29/2016 11:26:06 AM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Where is your link to your proof?


4 posted on 04/29/2016 11:27:03 AM PDT by tirednvirginia ( But help is on the way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Pretty sad

Because so was Scalia.

I guess we can forget about getting any decent appointee to the SCOTUS since they will all be Lawyers. I guess we can get another professor nimrod.

Wouldn’t want any lawyers on the courts deciding what constitutional and whats not.


5 posted on 04/29/2016 11:27:24 AM PDT by OneVike (I'm just a Christian waiting for a ride home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
I await the ‘billing’ hours record to be published. Boehner would have those, right?
6 posted on 04/29/2016 11:27:51 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tirednvirginia

Go to the article moron.

I posted it.

I didn’t write it


7 posted on 04/29/2016 11:28:31 AM PDT by OneVike (I'm just a Christian waiting for a ride home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

8 posted on 04/29/2016 11:29:28 AM PDT by vikingrinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

“I was a junior lawyer. My boss was hired to be [Boehner’s] lawyer,” Cruz explained. “So I worked on the case. I worked on some appellate briefs. I don’t know that I ever met him. We haven’t said 50 words to each other in our lives. I was a baby lawyer a couple years out of law school working on editing some briefs and helping write them. But I don’t know the man.”

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ted-cruz-says-he-was-just-a-baby-lawyer-when-he-worked-for-john-boehner/

If he’s telling the truth.


9 posted on 04/29/2016 11:29:50 AM PDT by McGruff (Denial ain't just a river in Egypt - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

I followed a gawker(sp)/twitter link on FR yesterday and saw Boehner say Cruz was his lawyer.


10 posted on 04/29/2016 11:30:04 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

STOP THE SADNESS! I didn’t make mention of the SCOTUS, I’m talking about another lawyer in the White House, which i am 100% against.


11 posted on 04/29/2016 11:30:42 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

“In the old days we had proper balance on things when a lie was posted. Well, I like the old days, so here is some balance...”

Well said.


12 posted on 04/29/2016 11:32:31 AM PDT by Made In The USA (Rap music: Soundtrack of the retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Seems to me an admission that he was, at one time, hired as a lawyer for Boehner and Company. The fact that he was a “baby lawyer” doing some appellate briefs for his boss on Boehner’s behalf doesn’t make the claim that he was once Boehner’s lawyer untrue.


13 posted on 04/29/2016 11:32:57 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

We are still waiting to see a SINGLE piece of paper that shows that Ted Cruz’ birth was registered with the United States Government at his birth. All the official paper we have seen so far, i.e. his Canadian Birth Certificate, and Renunciation of that Canadian Citizenship, indicate that he was in fact a Natural Born Canadian, and do not establish any claim to American citizenship at all.


14 posted on 04/29/2016 11:33:41 AM PDT by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Sorry. Its the article not you.


15 posted on 04/29/2016 11:34:14 AM PDT by tirednvirginia ( But help is on the way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
We should give Senator Cruz the benefit of the doubt on this. His law firm Represented Boehner, not Cruz personally.
16 posted on 04/29/2016 11:34:45 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
The following quote is from the Business Insider article and since Cruz mentions Boehner by name from 1998 he did know him and was his attorney for a brief time. Everyone is always wrong but Cruz in some opinions.

"The fund-raising letter is much ado about nothing," Cruz told The Seattle Times. "Congressman McDermott has consistently attempted to delay the litigation and drive up the expense. It is reasonably expected that Congressman Boehner will use the means at his disposal to raise the funds to pursue this lawsuit."

17 posted on 04/29/2016 11:35:16 AM PDT by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tirednvirginia
Where is your link to your proof?

Asking for proof of a negative is a classic debating ploy that is easily shot down.

18 posted on 04/29/2016 11:36:03 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: equaviator
Yes, we hate lawyers but really, really love, sleazy, crony capitalist businessmen.
19 posted on 04/29/2016 11:37:24 AM PDT by beandog (Where have all the conservatives gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

“The alleged disclosure at issue here did not involve a conversation on a purely private matter,” McDermott’s attorneys argue. “It involved a conversation regarding an attempt to orchestrate a political response to a reprimand of the speaker by the House Ethics Committee in violation of an explicit agreement to the contrary between the speaker and the committee.

“This is core political speech and lies at the very heart of the First Amendment,” the reply argues. “If a citizen who lawfully obtains such speech can be punished for disclosing it to the media, the protections of the First Amendment are more illusory than real.”

But Ted Cruz, Boehner’s attorney, said the fund-raising letter demonstrates nothing and highlights the weakness of McDermott’s defense. Boehner alleges that McDermott gave the taped phone call - which Republicans argue did not violate any promise made by Gingrich - to The New York Times, The Atlanta Journal and Roll Call, a semiweekly congressional newspaper.

“The fund-raising letter is much ado about nothing,” Cruz said. “Congressman McDermott has consistently attempted to delay the litigation and drive up the expense. It is reasonably expected that Congressman Boehner will use the means at his disposal to raise the funds to pursue this lawsuit.”

http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19980602&slug=2754000


20 posted on 04/29/2016 11:37:36 AM PDT by McGruff (Denial ain't just a river in Egypt - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson