Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kennedy
Voter ID laws were expressly upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, a 6 to 3 decision in 2008.

Why is it that any Supreme Court decisions that liberals like are "settled law" that cannot be touched, but any decisions that liberals do not like are continuously litigated until they finally get the decision that they want?

4 posted on 04/29/2016 9:44:20 AM PDT by kennedy (No relation to those other Kennedys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kennedy
Why is it that any Supreme Court decisions that liberals like are "settled law" that cannot be touched, but any decisions that liberals do not like are continuously litigated until they finally get the decision that they want?

I hate to say it but the retards are smarter than the Constitutionalists, I guess.

9 posted on 04/29/2016 9:49:17 AM PDT by itsahoot (Trump is a fumble mouthed blowhard that can't finish a sentence, but he will finish a term.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kennedy
Why is it that any Supreme Court decisions that liberals like are "settled law" that cannot be touched, but any decisions that liberals do not like are continuously litigated until they finally get the decision that they want?

Liberal Handbook Rule #2:

"If you are losing or don't get the result you want, change the rules and keep trying."

14 posted on 04/29/2016 9:52:53 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (#BlackOlivesMatter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kennedy
Why is it that any Supreme Court decisions that liberals like are "settled law" that cannot be touched, but any decisions that liberals do not like are continuously litigated until they finally get the decision that they want?

Not only are the leftist-approved Supreme Court decisions declared "settled law," but they are applied broadly, across the board, into every remotely tangential issues imaginable.

So, marriage redefinition somehow nullifies religious freedom.

17 posted on 04/29/2016 10:00:45 AM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kennedy
" ...decisions that liberals like are "settled law" that cannot be touched, but any decisions that liberals do not like are continuously litigated until they finally get the decision that they want?"

This is exactly how children behave. And like children they count on you eventually being tired, distracted, in some moment of weakness so they can finally get their way.

19 posted on 04/29/2016 10:05:53 AM PDT by Let's Roll ("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality" -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kennedy
Why is it that any Supreme Court decisions that liberals like are "settled law" that cannot be touched, but any decisions that liberals do not like are continuously litigated until they finally get the decision that they want?

Pelosi said it herself.....when THEIR measures pass, she says The People have spoken. Yet, when they fail she says this is not over

I guess the skank doesn't like the other "people" who speak.

25 posted on 04/29/2016 10:25:13 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson