1 posted on
04/28/2016 12:07:55 PM PDT by
Rio
To: Rio
God Bless them! Praying it turns out well for that Christian couple, which means it turns out well for us...all Christians are under attack.
2 posted on
04/28/2016 12:10:05 PM PDT by
Wpin
("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
To: Rio
I agree that this case is fundamental. Its outcome will tell us with clarity whether or not this is still a free country. I fully expect the Kleins to lose bigtime.
3 posted on
04/28/2016 12:11:23 PM PDT by
madprof98
To: Rio
It's really been striking the way the Kleins have become poster children for this movement across the country that aims to undermine the very basic civil rights and human dignity of LGBT people." Forcing others to celebrate your lifestyle choices is not a "very basic civil right."
Free speech can now "undermine the dignity of LGBT people," and the undermining of dignity is now a criminal act.
4 posted on
04/28/2016 12:19:50 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: Rio
Rachel Bowman-Cryer said during the BOLI hearing that the experience left her "humiliated and ashamed and destroyed and questioning questioning whether anybody or not would accept us as a married couple."
No it didn't. They are simply lying through their teeth. It did nothing but anger them, and they and the pond scum Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian couldn't care less about the first amendment or religious rights. They have an agenda to destroy Christianity, and couldn't care less about the fallout.
To: Rio
Could they just bake a plain cake and let the pervs decorate it themselves? I’m sure pervs could do a fabulous job together just the way they like it.
9 posted on
04/28/2016 12:31:56 PM PDT by
Zuse
(I am disrupted! I am offended! I am insulted! I am outraged!)
To: Rio
Rachel Bowman-Cryer said during the BOLI hearing that the experience left her "humiliated and ashamed and destroyed and questioning questioning whether anybody or not would accept us as a married couple."What a crock of crap!
If the Klein version is to be believed (and they'd never been caught in a lie, unlike the plaintiff), they not only were polite in turning away this business, but they gave the dyke a couple of recommendations of places which would be happy to serve her.
Rather than go there, the ACLU conspired with the dyke to sponsor her complaint and destroy the Klein's business knowing that they had ace in the hole at the top of the Oregon state government.
This case isn't about getting a service, it is about breaking a business to the government saddle regardless of the consequences.
11 posted on
04/28/2016 12:32:46 PM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
To: Rio
"Rachel Bowman-Cryer said during the BOLI hearing that the experience left her "humiliated and ashamed and destroyed and questioning questioning whether anybody or not would accept us as a married couple."
GAG! GROW UP WHINY BABY, LIVE WITH IT...YOU ARE DIFFERENT AND THAT IS YOUR PROBLEM!
12 posted on
04/28/2016 12:38:45 PM PDT by
Stayfree
To: Rio
I was in a seminar in Austria last year on religious freedom and they were asking me about this case and about the woman who wouldn’t sign the marriage certificates. arrrrgggg. I forgot her name. Davis?
13 posted on
04/28/2016 12:39:03 PM PDT by
Mercat
(Boredom is a problem on the inside. And happiness, too, is an inside job.)
To: Rio
The comments at the article are overflowing with hate-filled remarks towards the Kleins. What nasty, bitter, evil people these commentators are.
15 posted on
04/28/2016 12:45:40 PM PDT by
bkopto
To: Rio
Ive always believed the “art” aspect of the product would be the saving grace for these people. After all, who could argue that a painter or a sculptor is free to decline a particular commissioned piece? But aren’t these cakes simply an edible canvas upon which an artist adds his decorative and commissioned creation?
18 posted on
04/28/2016 12:54:39 PM PDT by
Sgt_Schultze
(If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
To: Rio
Suppose the Westboro Baptist Church comes to Oregon to hold one of their "God Hates Fags" protests at a local military funeral, an activity that
the U.S. Supreme Court held is their constitutional right in a 9 to 1 decision. They try to hire a gay caterer to cater their protest. The gay caterer refuses.
Will the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries order the gay caterer to pay Westboro Baptist Church $135,000 in damages?
20 posted on
04/28/2016 1:04:07 PM PDT by
kennedy
(No relation to those other Kennedys.)
To: Rio
Suppose the Westboro Baptist Church comes to Oregon to hold one of their "God Hates Fags" protests at a local military funeral, an activity that
the U.S. Supreme Court held is their constitutional right in a 9 to 1 decision. They try to hire a gay caterer to cater their protest. The gay caterer refuses.
Will the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries order the gay caterer to pay Westboro Baptist Church $135,000 in damages?
21 posted on
04/28/2016 1:04:08 PM PDT by
kennedy
(No relation to those other Kennedys.)
To: Rio
What always gets ignored or downplayed by these perves and their supporters is that Sweet Cakes did not refuse because they were gay. Sweet Cakes had in fact made them cakes before and had done other things. The was only to refuse for this specific wedding, totally within their religious expression rights. But for the perves and their supporters, the truth doesn’t matter — only the objective. This country is going to hell!
26 posted on
04/28/2016 1:37:48 PM PDT by
falcon99
To: Rio
27 posted on
04/28/2016 1:49:15 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell)
To: Rio
Anybody know if they have a GoFundMe type site?
29 posted on
04/28/2016 2:08:50 PM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(Tell the truth and shame the Devil.)
To: Rio
Hope the attorney delays the case substantially until after January 20, 2017.
36 posted on
04/28/2016 3:00:08 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell)
To: Rio
i still say it's easier to make them a cake that tastes bad or shoot pictures that are blurry and out of focus than fighting them in court and have fun doing it
45 posted on
04/28/2016 4:01:48 PM PDT by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
To: Rio
We relinquished the right to refuse service long ago
61 posted on
04/29/2016 8:31:49 AM PDT by
wardaddy
(gonna need a lot of rope and lamposts and gibbets after this primary season.....)
To: Rio
AND this ruling the opposite of other rulings where muslims were ALLOWED to refuse to do work based on their religious beliefs
(i.e. muslims who were fired for refusing to deliver beer were awarded tens of thousands of dollars upholding their right to religious belief)
I AM SO GLAD THEY APEALED THIS
62 posted on
04/29/2016 8:43:12 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(Trump / ???)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson